The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adult Scoliosis: Prevalence, SF-36, and Nutritional Parameters in an Elderly Volunteer Population
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A prospective self-assessment analysis and evaluation of nutritional and radiographic parameters in a consecutive series of healthy adult volunteers older than 60 years. Objectives. To ascertain the prevalence of adult scoliosis, assess radiographic parameters, and determine if there is a correlation with functional self-assessment in an aged volunteer population. Summary of Background Data. There exists little data studying the prevalence of scoliosis in a volunteer aged population, and correlation between deformity and self-assessment parameters. Methods. There were 75 subjects in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥60 years, no known history of scoliosis, and no prior spine surgery. Each subject answered a RAND 36-Item Health Survey questionnaire, a full-length anteroposterior standing radiographic assessment of the spine was obtained, and nutritional parameters were analyzed from blood samples. For each subject, radiographic, laboratory, and clinical data were evaluated. The study population was divided into 3 groups based on frontal plane Cobb angulation of the spine. Comparison of the RAND 36-Item Health Surveys data among groups of the volunteer population and with United States population benchmark data (age 65−74 years) was undertaken using an unpaired t test. Any correlation between radiographic, laboratory, and self-assessment data were also investigated. Results. The mean age of the patients in this study was 70.5 years (range 60−90). Mean Cobb angle was17° in the frontal plane. In the study group, 68% of subjects met the definition of scoliosis (Cobb angle >10°). No significant correlation was noted among radiographic parameters and visual analog scale scores, albumin, lymphocytes, or transferrin levels in the study group as a whole. Prevalence of scoliosis was not significantly different between males and females (P > 0.03). The scoliosis prevalence rate of 68% found in this study reveals a rate significantly higher than reported in other studies. These findings most likely reflect the targeted selection of an elderly group. Although many patients with adult scoliosis have pain and dysfunction, there appears to be a large group (such as the volunteers in this study) that has no marked physical or social impairment. Conclusions. Previous reports note a prevalence of adult scoliosis up to 32%. In this study, results indicate a scoliosis rate of 68% in a healthy adult population, with an average age of 70.5 years. This study found no significant correlations between adult scoliosis and visual analog scale scores or nutritional status in healthy, elderly volunteers. This study analyzed the prevalence of adult scoliosis in a volunteer, healthy elderly (older than 60 years) population (75 subjects). Radiographic studies, nutritional laboratory profiles, and the RAND 36-Item Health Surveys were analyzed. The prevalence of adult scoliosis was higher than previously reported (68%). No correlations existed among adult scoliosis and visual analog scale scores, or nutritional status in this healthy, elderly volunteer population. In one subgroup (group II) alone, 3 of the 8 RAND 36-Item Health Survey categories were significantly different from the United States population benchmark data (age 65–74 years).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Adult Scoliosis: A Quantitative Radiographic and Clinical Analysis
Schwab, F. J., Smith, V. A., Biserni, M., Gamez, L., Farcy, J.-P. C., & Pagala, M. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200202150-00012 · Cited by 429
Self-citationRobin, G. C., SPAN, Y., Steinberg, R., et al. (1982) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198207000-00005 · Cited by 230
The Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire In Spine Surgery
Grevitt, M. P., Khazim, R. M., Webb, J. K., et al. (1997) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.1269 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Adult Spinal Deformity: Epidemiology, Health Impact, Evaluation, and Management
Ames, C. P., Scheer, J. K., Lafage, V., Smith, J. S., Bess, S., Berven, S. H., Mundis, G. M., Sethi, R. K., Deinlein, D. A., Coe, J. D., et al. (2016) · Spine Deformity · doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.009 · Cited by 284
A Review of Quality of Life and Psychosocial Issues in Scoliosis
Tones, M., Moss, N., & Polly, D. W. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwab, F., Dubey, A., Gamez, L., El Fegoun, A. B., Hwang, K., Pagala, M., & Farcy, J. P.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1082-1085
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022081083
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adult Scoliosis: Prevalence, SF-36, and Nutritional Parameters in an Elderly Volunteer Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd
- The paper
- Schwab, F., Dubey, A., Gamez, L., El Fegoun, A. B., Hwang, K., Pagala, M., & Farcy, J. P. (2005). Adult Scoliosis: Prevalence, SF-36, and Nutritional Parameters in an Elderly Volunteer Population. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.