Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Quality of Life and Psychosocial Issues in Scoliosis

Tones, Megan, Moss, Nathan, Polly, David W.·2006·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. Recent literature regarding the psychological impact of scoliosis was reviewed. Objective. To determine the impact of scoliosis on health-related quality of life (HRQL), psychosocial functioning, and body image to improve patient outcomes. Summary of Background Data. Adolescents and adults with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have been known to score lower than healthy controls on HRQL measures. However, HRQL instruments may not adequately capture psychological distress experienced by patients. Methods. Research papers concerning HRQL and psychosocial factors in patients with scoliosis were reviewed. Results. Studies of psychosocial health and body image have revealed that functioning in these domains may affect compliance behavior and satisfaction with treatment outcomes among adolescent patients. Psychosocial and body image disturbance is less marked in patients with good social or family functioning, or patients who exercise regularly or are psychologically healthy. Adults with scoliosis generally display fewer psychological problems than adolescents. However, adults with scoliosis may experience psychosocial limitations due to poor physical health or body image disturbance. Support group membership can improve psychosocial health in adults with scoliosis. Conclusions. Adolescent patients with scoliosis may experience psychosocial difficulties, especially while undergoing treatment for scoliosis. Interventions aimed at managing psychosocial or body image disturbances may help to ameliorate the potentially negative impact of scoliosis on these facets of life. This paper reviews the psychological aspects of scoliosis. Patients with scoliosis generally score lower than healthy controls on measures of health-related quality of life, psychosocial functioning, and body image. Adolescent patients generally have poorer functioning compared with their healthy peers than adults, especially if they experience concurrent stressors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Metadata

Authors
Tones, M., Moss, N., & Polly, D. W.
Venue
Spine
Published
2006-12
Volume
31
Issue
26
Pages
3027-3038
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1481981074
Cited by
268
References
23
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Quality of Life and Psychosocial Issues in Scoliosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc
The paper
Tones, M., Moss, N., & Polly, D. W. (2006). A Review of Quality of Life and Psychosocial Issues in Scoliosis. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.