Prevalence of Low Back Pain in a Developing Urban Setting
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using face-to-face interviews. Objectives. To estimate the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in an urban population of Turkey and to determine the factors associated with occurrence of LBP. Summary of Background Data. Little information exists in the literature regarding the epidemiology of LBP in developing countries. A few data from previous studies suggest that the prevalence of LBP is rather lower in developing countries compared with developed countries. Methods. A total of 100 clusters of households (3,215 residents aged 16 years or older) in municipality area of Antalya was selected by systematic sampling. Of these, 3,173 study participants agreed to interview. The response rate was 98.7%. Results. The crude lifetime, 12-month, and point prevalences of LBP were 46.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.9–48.3), 35.9% (95% CI, 34.2–37.6), and 20.1% (95% CI, 18.7–21.5), respectively. In logistic regression analysis, age of 36 years or older, female sex, multiparity, being a housewife, being from East Turkey, and smoking showed independent associations with having current LBP. Being religious, heavy smoking, and age 26 to 45 years were associated with having restricted activity related to LBP. Conclusions. In comparison with other developing countries, point prevalence of LBP is higher in Turkey and approximates to prevalence estimates of LBP in developed countries. Smoking may be associated with both occurrence and severity of LBP. Although piety is not associated with having LBP, religious people are more likely to have restricted activity related to LBP. This is a cross-sectional survey conducted in Turkey, which reveals a higher prevalence of low back pain (LBP) compared with other developing countries. Female sex, multiparity, smoking, and some ethno-socio-cultural characteristics are associated with the occurrence of LBP. Religiousness is associated with increased likelihood of restricted activity related to LBP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level).
“Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [490]
Cites
Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation
Buchbinder, R., Jolley, D., & Wyatt, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1516 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
The Prevalence of Low Back Pain in Adults: A Methodological Review of the Literature
Loney, P., & Stratford, P. W. (1999) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/79.4.384 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Goldberg, M. S., Scott, S. C., & Mayo, N. E. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200004150-00016 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Prevalence of subjective health complaints (SHC) in Norway
Ihlebæk, C., Eriksen, H. R., & Ursin, H. (2002) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/14034948020300010701 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.
Walsh, K., Cruddas, M., & Coggon, D. (1992) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.46.3.227 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
The Epidemiology of Low Back Pain in the Rest of the World
Volinn, E. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199708010-00013 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Chaiamnuay, P., Darmawan, J., Muirden, K. D., & Asavatanabodee, P. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Prevalence of the major rheumatic disorders in the adult population of north Pakistan
Farooqi, A., & Gibson, T. (1998) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/37.5.491 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Keefe, F. J., Affleck, G., Lefebvre, J., Underwood, L., Caldwell, D. S., Drew, J., Egert, J., Gibson, J., & Pargament, K. (2001) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1054/jpai.2001.19296 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Sociocultural Factors and Back Pain
Skovron, M. L., Szpalski, M., Nordin, M. C., Mélot, C., & Cukier, D. (1994) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199401001-00002 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Risk Factors for Low Back Pain and Sciatica
Heliövaara, M. (1989) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853898909149202 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Biering‐Sørensen, F., & Thomsen, C. (1986) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-198609000-00011 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Dai, S., Han, X.-H., Zhao, D.-B., et al. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Socioeconomic influences on back problems in the community in Britain.
Croft, P. R., & Rigby, A. S. (1994) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.48.2.166 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Wigley, R. D., Zhang, N.-Z., Zeng, Q., Shi, C. S., Hu, D.-W., Couchman, K. G., Duff, I. F., & Bennett, P. H. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Chopra, A., Saluja, M., Patil, J., & Tandale, H. S. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Influence of Smoking on the Health Status of Spinal Patients
Vogt, M. T., Hanscom, B. S., Lauerman, W. C., & Kang, J. D. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200202010-00022 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Prevalence of the rheumatic diseases in urban Vietnam: a WHO-ILAR COPCORD study.
Hoa, T. T. M., Darmawan, J., Chen, S. L., et al. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Darmawan, J., Valkenburg, H. A., Muirden, K. D., et al. (1992) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/ard.51.4.525 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Dans, L. F., Tankeh‐Torres, S. A., Amante, C. M., et al. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Hoy, D., TOOLE, M. J., Morgan, D. W., et al. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12254-4 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Community survey of factors associated with consultation for low back pain
Waxman, R., Tennant, A., & Helliwell, P. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1564 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Rheumatic pain in a Philippine village
Manahan, L. A., Caragay, R. N., Muirden, K. D., Allander, E., Valkenburg, H. A., & Wigley, R. D. (1985) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/bf00541515 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Heistaro, S., Vartiainen, E. A., Heliövaara, M., & Puska, P. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/148.7.671 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
BENNETT, K. J., Cardiel, M. H., Ferraz, M. B., et al. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The epidemiology of soft tissue rheumatism
Natvig, B., & Picavet, H. S. J. (2002) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1053/berh.2002.0265 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Ambiguous relation between physical workload and low back pain: a twin control study
Hartvigsen, J., Kyvik, K. O., Leboeuf‐Yde, C., et al. (2003) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.60.2.109 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Number of children as a risk factor for low back pain in men and women
Silman, A. J., Ferry, S., Papageorgiou, A. C., et al. (1995) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780380909 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Lawrence (1998) · doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications
Koenig, H. G. (2012) · ISRN Psychiatry · doi:10.5402/2012/278730 · Cited by 2,423 · see citing works
“Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483– 495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive an…”
- Authors
- Gilgil, E., Kaçar, C., Bütün, B., Tuncer, T., Urhan, S., Yildirim, Ç., Sünbüloglu, G., Arikan, V., Tekeoglu, I., Öksüz, M. C., & Dündar, Ü.
- Affiliations
- Akdeniz University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Gilgil, Erdal
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1093-1098
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970814372
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Spine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- low back pain, prevalence, developing countries, urban population, smoking, religiosity, multiparity, sex differences, physical activity limitation, Turkey, Antalya
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Turkey, Urban Health, Urban Population, Prevalence, Low Back Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review