Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplanted to a Rabbit Degenerative Disc Model: Potential and Limitations for Stem Cell Therapy in Disc Regeneration

Sakai, Daisuke, Mochida, Joji, Iwashina, Toru, Watanabe, Takuya, Nakai, Tomoko, Ando, Kiyoshi, Hotta, Tomomitsu·2005·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo study to assess the differentiation status of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted to the nucleus pulposus of degenerative discs in a rabbit model. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the fate of MSCs transplanted to the nucleus pulposus of degenerative discs in a rabbit and to determine whether they are a suitable alternative for cell transplantation therapy for disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although MSCs have been proposed as candidate donor cells for transplantation to treat intervertebral disc degeneration, their differentiation after transplantation has not been adequately investigated. METHODS: Autologous MSCs, labeled with green fluorescent protein, were transplanted into mature rabbits. Consecutive counts of transplanted MSCs in the nucleus area were performed for 48 weeks after transplantation. Differentiation of transplanted cells was determined by immunohistochemical analysis. The proteoglycan content of discs was measured quantitatively using a dimethylmethylene blue assay, and mRNA expression of Type I and II collagen, aggrecan and versican was measured semi-quantitatively using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Many cells that were positive for green fluorescent protein were observed in the nucleus pulposus of cell-transplanted rabbit discs 2 weeks after transplantation. Their number increased significantly by 48 weeks. Some GFP-positive cells were positive for cell-associated matrix molecules, such as Type II collagen, keratan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, aggrecan, and the nucleus pulposus phenotypic markers, hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha, glutamine transporter 1, and matrix metalloproteinase 2. MSCs did not show significant expression of these molecules before transplantation. Biochemical and gene expression analyses showed significant restoration of total proteoglycan content and matrix-related genes compared with nontransplanted discs. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs transplanted to degenerative discs in rabbits proliferated and differentiated into cells expressing some of the major phenotypic characteristics of nucleus pulposus cells, suggesting that these MSCs may have undergone site-dependent differentiation. Further studies are needed to evaluate their functional role.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000184365.28481.e3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Sakai, D., Mochida, J., Iwashina, T., Watanabe, T., Nakai, T., Ando, K., & Hotta, T.
Venue
Spine
Published
2005-11
Volume
30
Issue
21
Pages
2379-2387
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068030474
Cited by
354
References
1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplanted to a Rabbit Degenerative Disc Model: Potential and Limitations for Stem Cell Therapy in Disc Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000184365.28481.e3
The paper
Sakai, D., Mochida, J., Iwashina, T., Watanabe, T., Nakai, T., Ando, K., & Hotta, T. (2005). Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Transplanted to a Rabbit Degenerative Disc Model: Potential and Limitations for Stem Cell Therapy in Disc Regeneration. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000184365.28481.e3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.