Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exhaustion of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells with ageing and degeneration of the intervertebral disc

Open access
Sakai, Daisuke, Nakamura, Yoshihiko, Nakai, Tomoko, Mishima, Taishi, Kato, Shunichi, Grad, Sibylle, Alini, Mauro, Risbud, Makarand V., Chan, Danny, Cheah, Kathryn S.E., Yamamura, Ken-ichi, Masuda, Koichi, Okano, Hideyuki, Ando, Kiyoshi, Mochida, Joji·2012·Nature Communications

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of intervertebral disc disease, little is known about changes in intervertebral disc cells and their regenerative potential with ageing and intervertebral disc degeneration. Here we identify populations of progenitor cells that are Tie2 positive (Tie2+) and disialoganglioside 2 positive (GD2+), in the nucleus pulposus from mice and humans. These cells form spheroid colonies that express type II collagen and aggrecan. They are clonally multipotent and differentiated into mesenchymal lineages and induced reorganization of nucleus pulposus tissue when transplanted into non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice. The frequency of Tie2+ cells in tissues from patients decreases markedly with age and degeneration of the intervertebral disc, suggesting exhaustion of their capacity for regeneration. However, progenitor cells (Tie2+GD2+) can be induced from their precursor cells (Tie2+GD2−) under simple culture conditions. Moreover, angiopoietin-1, a ligand of Tie2, is crucial for the survival of nucleus pulposus cells. Our results offer insights for regenerative therapy and a new diagnostic standard. Back pain and sciatica are often caused by intervertebral disc degeneration. Sakai and colleagues identify a subset of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells from the intervertebral disc and show that loss of these progenitor cells correlates with ageing and intervertebral disc degeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms2226

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Sakai, D., Nakamura, Y., Nakai, T., Mishima, T., Kato, S., Grad, S., Alini, M., Risbud, M. V., Chan, D., Cheah, K. S. E., Yamamura, K.-I., Masuda, K., Okano, H., Ando, K., & Mochida, J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2012-12-11
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1264-1264
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982678468
Cited by
451
References
31
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exhaustion of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells with ageing and degeneration of the intervertebral disc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms2226
The paper
Sakai, D., Nakamura, Y., Nakai, T., Mishima, T., Kato, S., Grad, S., Alini, M., Risbud, M. V., Chan, D., Cheah, K. S. E., Yamamura, K.-I., Masuda, K., Okano, H., Ando, K., & Mochida, J. (2012). Exhaustion of nucleus pulposus progenitor cells with ageing and degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2226

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.