Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Function Domain

Asher, Marc A., Lai, Sue Min, Glattes, R Chris, Burton, Douglas C., Alanay, Ahmet, Bago, Juan·2006·Spine

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. OBJECTIVES: To improve the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) questionnaire Function domain internal consistency for patients younger than 18 years. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During English validation as well as Spanish and Turkish transcultural adaptation studies, low internal consistency of the Function domain was discovered for patients younger than 18 years. The problem was traced to questions 15 (relating to financial considerations) and 18 (relating to going out with friends). Otherwise, the SRS-22 HRQL questionnaire has been shown to be valid and has been successfully translated into Spanish and Turkish. METHODS: Based on existing data, question 18's stem and responses were revised without changing its content and added to the SRS-22 questionnaire. Question 15 remained unchanged, and the effect of inclusion or exclusion on domain score was determined. During a 3-month period, the questionnaire was completed by 111 outpatients, including four groups: idiopathic scoliosis age < 18 years (n = 37), idiopathic scoliosis age > or = 18 years (n = 32), other spinal disorders age < 18 years (n = 17), and other spinal disorders age > or = 18 years (n = 25). RESULTS: As a result of the revision of question 18, the Function domain internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha, for patients age <18 years was increased from 0.67 to 0.78 for patients with idiopathic scoliosis and from 0.60 to 0.80 for patients with other spinal disorders. Domain internal consistency remained high, 0.77 to 0.96 for all the other domain-patient groupings. Removal of question 15 slightly improved Function domain internal consistency for idiopathic scoliosis patients < 18 years old and slightly decreased it for patients < 18 years old with other spinal conditions. CONCLUSION: With a minor revision of question 18 (related to going out) the internal consistency of the SRS-22 Function domain has been improved in idiopathic scoliosis patients < 18 years of age. Deletion of question 15 (related to financial considerations) has a variable, small effect depending on patient group. Retention of question 15 is recommended unless a cultural variable, such as differences in healthcare payment schemes, substantially lowers domain psychometric properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Metadata

Authors
Asher, M. A., Lai, S. M., Glattes, R. C., Burton, D. C., Alanay, A., & Bago, J.
Venue
Spine
Published
2006-03
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
593-597
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974125692
Cited by
275
References
10
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Function Domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea
The paper
Asher, M. A., Lai, S. M., Glattes, R. C., Burton, D. C., Alanay, A., & Bago, J. (2006). Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Function Domain. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.