Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Clinical Impact Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult

Schwab, Frank, Farcy, Jean-Pierre, Bridwell, Keith, Berven, Sigurd, Glassman, Steven, Harrast, John, Horton, William·2006·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. Multicenter, prospective, consecutive clinical series. Objectives. To establish and validate classification of scoliosis in the adult. Summary of Background Data. Studies of adult scoliosis reveal the impact of radiographic parameters on self-assessed function: lumbar lordosis and frontal plane obliquity of lumbar vertebrae, not Cobb angle, correlate with pain scores. Deformity apex and intervertebral subluxations correlate with disability. Methods. A total of 947 adults with spinal deformity had radiographic analysis: frontal Cobb angle, deformity apex, lumbar lordosis, and intervertebral subluxation. Health assessment included Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society instrument. Deformity apex, lordosis (T12–S1), and intervertebral subluxation were used to classify patients. Outcomes measures and surgical rates were evaluated. Results. Mean maximal coronal Cobb was 46° and lumbar lordosis 46°. Mean maximal intervertebral subluxation (frontal plane) was 4.2 mm (sagittal plane, 1.2 mm). In thoracolumbar/lumbar deformities, the loss of lordosis/higher subluxation was associated with lower Scoliosis Research Society pain/function and higher Oswestry Disability Index scores. Across the study group, lower apex combined with lower lordosis led to higher disability. Higher surgical rates with decreasing lumbar lordosis and higher intervertebral subluxation were detected. Conclusions. A clinical impact classification has been established based on radiographic markers of disability. The classification has shown correlation with self-reported disability as well as rates of operative treatment. A multicenter prospective effort, including 947 patients, focused on classification of adult scoliosis. Radiographic analysis (deformity apex, lumbar lordosis, and intervertebral subluxation), outcomes measures (Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society instruments), and surgical rates were examined. The classification into types (apex) and addition of modifiers (lordosis and subluxation) permitted clinically significant groupings (disability, pain, and surgical rates).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000231725.38943.ab

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Metadata

Authors
Schwab, F., Farcy, J.-P., Bridwell, K., Berven, S., Glassman, S., Harrast, J., & Horton, W.
Venue
Spine
Published
2006-08
Volume
31
Issue
18
Pages
2109-2114
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999529158
Cited by
311
References
7
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clinical Impact Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000231725.38943.ab
The paper
Schwab, F., Farcy, J.-P., Bridwell, K., Berven, S., Glassman, S., Harrast, J., & Horton, W. (2006). A Clinical Impact Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231725.38943.ab

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.