Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Persistent neuromuscular and neurophysiologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of prolonged critical illness*

Fletcher, Simon N., Kennedy, Daniel D., Ghosh, Indrajit R., Misra, Vijay P., Kiff, Kevin, Coakley, John H., Hinds, Charles J.·2003·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and electrophysiologic features of residual neuromuscular dysfunction after prolonged critical illness. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study of survivors of prolonged critical illness. SETTING: A university hospital and two district general hospitals in the UK. PATIENTS: The study occurred for a period of 5 yrs. All patients during that time who were in the intensive care unit for >28 days were entered in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At follow-up, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score were recorded from the case notes. A clinical history was obtained, a Barthel Index disability score was calculated, and a full neurologic examination was performed. Nerve conduction studies, needle electromyography, single-fiber electromyography and thermal thresholds were performed. A total of 195 patients were identified. There were 86 survivors, of whom 47 could be contacted and 22 consented to be studied. The median time from intensive care unit discharge to follow-up was 43 months (range, 12-57 months). All gave a clear history of severe weakness and functional impairment after hospital discharge and, in all, recovery was prolonged. Motor or sensory deficits were present on clinical examination in 59% of the patients studied. Common peroneal nerve palsy was present in two patients. A total of 21 of 22 (95%) patients had electromyographic evidence of chronic partial denervation at follow-up, findings indicative of a preceding axonal neuropathy. The single-fiber electromyographic studies were also consistent with a preceding motor neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Severe weakness requiring prolonged rehabilitation and abnormal clinical neurologic findings are extremely common in survivors of protracted critical illness. Neurophysiologic evidence of chronic partial denervation of muscle consistent with previous critical illness polyneuropathy is almost invariable and can be found up to 5 yrs after intensive care unit discharge in >90% of these long-stay patients. Evidence of myopathy is unusual. These findings have important implications for the management and rehabilitation of intensive care survivors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000053651.38421.d9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fletcher, S. N., Kennedy, D. D., Ghosh, I. R., Misra, V. P., Kiff, K., Coakley, J. H., & Hinds, C. J.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1012-1016
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068555870
Cited by
412
References
0
FWCI
17.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.