The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: An evidence-based review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and to improve outcome in severe sepsis. DESIGN: The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee. METHODS: The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591. CONCLUSION: An arterial catheter should be placed as soon as possible in patients with septic shock. Vasopressors are indicated to maintain mean arterial pressure of <65 mm Hg, both during and following adequate fluid resuscitation. Norepinephrine or dopamine are the vasopressors of choice in the treatment of septic shock. Norepinephrine may be combined with dobutamine when cardiac output is being measured. Epinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin are not recommended as first-line agents in the treatment of septic shock. Vasopressin may be considered for salvage therapy. Low-dose dopamine is not recommended for the purpose of renal protection. Dobutamine is recommended as the agent of choice to increase cardiac output but should not be used for the purpose of increasing cardiac output above physiologic levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock
Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., & Tomlanovich, M. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010307 · Cited by 10,743
De Backer, D., Creteur, J., Silva, E., & Vincent, J.-L. (2003) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000063045.77339.b6 · Cited by 371
Self-citationDünser, M. W., Mayr, A. J., Tür, A., Pajk, W., Barbara, F., Knotzer, H., Ulmer, H., & Hasibeder, W. R. (2003) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000059722.94182.79 · Cited by 250
Effect of dopamine on gastrointestinal motility during critical illness
Dive, A., Foret, F., Jamart, J., Bulpa, P., & Installé, E. (2000) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001340051279 · Cited by 124 · cited 1×
“(46) used intestinal manometry to demonstrate that dopamine infused at 4 g·kg (1)·min 1 resulted in impaired gastroduodenal motility.”
MethodComparative haemodynamic effects of dopamine and dobutamine in septic shock.
Regnier, B., Safran, D., Carlet, J., & Teisseire, B. (1979) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01683192 · Cited by 99
Cited by
Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock
De Backer, D., Biston, P., Devriendt, J., Madl, C., Chochrad, D., Aldecoa, C., Brasseur, A., Defrance, P., Gottignies, P., & Vincent, J.-L. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907118 · Cited by 1,940
Self-citationBrierley, J., Carcillo, J. A., Choong, K., Cornell, T., DeCaen, A., Deymann, A., Doctor, A., Davis, A., Duff, J., Dugas, M.-A., et al. (2009) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819323c6 · Cited by 1,073
Actual incidence of global left ventricular hypokinesia in adult septic shock
Vieillard-Baron, A., Caille, V., Charron, C., Belliard, G., Page, B., & Jardin, F. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318174db05 · Cited by 571
Vasopressors for hypotensive shock
Gamper, G., Havel, C., Arrich, J., Losert, H., Pace, N. L., Müllner, M., & Herkner, H. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003709.pub4 · Cited by 239
Cunha-Goncalves, D., Perez-de-Sa, V., Larsson, A., Thörne, J., & Blomquist, S. (2009) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af40e0 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Beale, R. J., Hollenberg, S. M., Vincent, J.-L., & Parrillo, J. E.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- S455-S465
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168124318
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: An evidence-based review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000142909.86238.b1
- The paper
- Beale, R. J., Hollenberg, S. M., Vincent, J.-L., & Parrillo, J. E. (2004). Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: An evidence-based review. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000142909.86238.b1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.