Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increasing mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock: Effects on oxygen variables and renal function*

Bourgoin, Aurélie, Leone, Marc, Delmas, Anne, Garnier, Franck, Albanèse, Jacques, Martin, Claude·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effects of increasing mean arterial pressure on oxygen variables and renal function in septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with a diagnosis of septic shock who required fluid resuscitation and pressor agents to increase and maintain mean arterial pressure > or =60 mm Hg. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with fluid and norepinephrine to achieve and maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg. Then they were randomized in two groups: In the first group (control group, n = 14), mean arterial pressure was maintained at 65 mm Hg, and in the second group (n = 14), mean arterial pressure was increased to 85 mm Hg by increasing the dose of norepinephrine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance index, pulmonary vascular resistance index, left and right ventricular stroke indexes), metabolic variables (oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption-calorimetric method, arterial lactate), and renal function variables (urine flow, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance) were measured. After introduction of norepinephrine, similar values of hemodynamic, metabolic, and renal function variables were obtained in both groups. No changes were observed in group 1 during the study period. Increasing mean arterial pressure from 65 to 85 mm Hg with norepinephrine in group 2 resulted in a significant increase in cardiac index from 4.8 (3.8-6.0) to 5.8 (4.3-6.9) L.min.m. Arterial lactate and oxygen consumption did not change. No changes were observed in renal function variables: urine flow, 63 (14-127) and 70 (15-121) mL; serum creatinine, 170 (117-333) and 153 (112-310) mumol.L; and creatinine clearance, 50 (12-77) and 67 (13-89) mL.min.1.73 m. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing mean arterial pressure from 65 to 85 mm Hg with norepinephrine neither affects metabolic variables nor improves renal function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000157788.20591.23

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Bourgoin, A., Leone, M., Delmas, A., Garnier, F., Albanèse, J., & Martin, C.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-04
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
780-786
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977495126
Cited by
333
References
1
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock: Effects on oxygen variables and renal function*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000157788.20591.23
The paper
Bourgoin, A., Leone, M., Delmas, A., Garnier, F., Albanèse, J., & Martin, C. (2005). Increasing mean arterial pressure in patients with septic shock: Effects on oxygen variables and renal function*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000157788.20591.23

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.