Cited by 1,239Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAbdominal Surgery and Complications

High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock.

Open access
Asfar, Pierre, Meziani, Ferhat, Hamel, Jean-François, Grelon, Fabien, Megarbane, Bruno, Anguel, Nadia, Mira, Jean-Paul, Dequin, Pierre-François +23 more·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends targeting a mean arterial pressure of at least 65 mm Hg during initial resuscitation of patients with septic shock. However, whether this blood-pressure target is more or less effective than a higher target is unknown. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned 776 patients with septic shock to undergo resuscitation with a mean arterial pressure target of either 80 to 85 mm Hg (high-target group) or 65 to 70 mm Hg (low-target group). The primary end point was mortality at day 28. RESULTS: At 28 days, there was no significant between-group difference in mortality, with deaths reported in 142 of 388 patients in the high-target group (36.6%) and 132 of 388 patients in the low-target group (34.0%) (hazard ratio in the high-target group, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.38; P=0.57). There was also no significant difference in mortality at 90 days, with 170 deaths (43.8%) and 164 deaths (42.3%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.30; P=0.74). The occurrence of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (74 events [19.1%] and 69 events [17.8%], respectively; P=0.64). However, the incidence of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation was higher in the high-target group than in the low-target group. Among patients with chronic hypertension, those in the high-target group required less renal-replacement therapy than did those in the low-target group, but such therapy was not associated with a difference in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting a mean arterial pressure of 80 to 85 mm Hg, as compared with 65 to 70 mm Hg, in patients with septic shock undergoing resuscitation did not result in significant differences in mortality at either 28 or 90 days. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; SEPSISPAM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01149278.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1312173

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asfar, P., Meziani, F., Hamel, J.-F., Grelon, F., Megarbane, B., Anguel, N., Mira, J.-P., Dequin, P.-F., Gergaud, S., Weiss, N., Legay, F., Le Tulzo, Y., Conrad, M., Robert, R., Gonzalez, F., Guitton, C., Tamion, F., Tonnelier, J.-M., Guezennec, P., Van Der Linden, T., Vieillard-Baron, A., Mariotte, E., Pradel, G., Lesieur, O., Ricard, J.-D., Hervé, F., du Cheyron, D., Guerin, C., Mercat, A., Teboul, J.-L., & Radermacher, P.
Affiliations
  • Université d'Angers (FR)
  • Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier du Mans (FR)
  • Bicêtre Hospital (FR)
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers (FR)
  • Hôpital Avicenne (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle (FR)
  • Université Paris Diderot (FR)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-04-24
Volume
370
Issue
17
Pages
1583-1593
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2096350581
Cited by
1,239
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 103 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 51
FWCI
87.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Keywords
septic shock, mean arterial pressure targets, fluid resuscitation, 28-day mortality, 90-day mortality, atrial fibrillation, renal replacement therapy, chronic hypertension, Surviving Sepsis Campaign
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Resuscitation, Shock, Septic, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Incidence, Renal Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review