Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hyperventilation following head injury: Effect on ischemic burden and cerebral oxidative metabolism*

Coles, Jonathan P., Fryer, Tim D., Coleman, Martin R., Smielewski, Peter, Gupta, Arun K., Minhas, Pawan S., Aigbirhio, Franklin, Chatfield, Doris A., Williams, Guy B., Boniface, Simon, Carpenter, T Adrian, Clark, John C., Pickard, John D., Menon, David K.·2007·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hyperventilation exacerbates cerebral ischemia and compromises oxygen metabolism (CMRO2) following closed head injury. DESIGN: A prospective interventional study. SETTING: A specialist neurocritical care unit. PATIENTS: Ten healthy volunteers and 30 patients within 10 days of closed head injury. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects underwent oxygen-15 positron emission tomography imaging of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, CMRO2, and oxygen extraction fraction. In patients, positron emission tomography studies, somatosensory evoked potentials, and jugular venous saturation (SjO2) measurements were obtained at Paco2 levels of 36+/-3 and 29+/-2 torr. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We estimated the volume of ischemic brain and examined the efficiency of coupling between oxygen delivery and utilization using the sd of the oxygen extraction fraction distribution. We correlated CMRO2 to cerebral electrophysiology and examined the effects of hyperventilation on the amplitude of the cortical somatosensory evoked potential response. Patients showed higher ischemic brain volume than controls (17+/-22 vs. 2+/-3 mL; p<or=.05), with worse matching of oxygen delivery to demand (p<.001). Hyperventilation consistently reduced cerebral blood flow (p<.001) and resulted in increases in oxygen extraction fraction and ischemic brain volume (17+/-22 vs. 88+/-66 mL; p<.0001), which were undetected by SjO2 monitoring. Mean CMRO2 was slightly increased following hyperventilation, but responses were extremely variable, with 28% of patients demonstrating a decrease in CMRO2 that exceeded 95% prediction intervals for zero change in one or more regions. CMRO2 correlated with cerebral electrophysiology, and cortical somatosensory evoked potential amplitudes were significantly increased by hyperventilation. CONCLUSIONS: The acute cerebral blood flow reduction and increase in CMRO2 secondary to hyperventilation represent physiologic challenges to the traumatized brain. These challenges exhaust physiologic reserves in a proportion of brain regions in many subjects and compromise oxidative metabolism. Such ischemia is underestimated by common bedside monitoring tools and may represent a significant mechanism of avoidable neuronal injury following head trauma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000254066.37187.88

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Coles, J. P., Fryer, T. D., Coleman, M. R., Smielewski, P., Gupta, A. K., Minhas, P. S., Aigbirhio, F., Chatfield, D. A., Williams, G. B., Boniface, S., Carpenter, T. A., Clark, J. C., Pickard, J. D., & Menon, D. K.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
568-578
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102297199
Cited by
276
References
3
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.