Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy

Latronico, Nicola, Peli, Elena, Botteri, Marco·2005·Current Opinion in Critical Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the major pathophysiological and diagnostic features of critical illness myopathy (CIM) and polyneuropathy (CIP), and to discuss problems concerning the risk factors for CIM and CIP. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathophysiology of critical illness myopathy and critical illness polyneuropathy is complex, involving metabolic, inflammatory, and bioenergetic alterations. This review cites new evidence supporting several pathogenetic mechanisms. These include microvascular changes in peripheral nerves (with increased endothelial expression of E-selectin), the possible role for an altered lipid serum profile in promoting organ dysfunction (including nerve dysfunction), the damage or inhibition of complex I of the respiratory chain as a cause of muscle ATP depletion and bioenergetic failure, and the activation of specific intracellular proteolytic systems causing myofilament loss and apoptosis in CIM. The diagnostic role of direct muscle stimulation and the rapid quantification of myosin/actin ratio based on electrophoresis are also presented. SUMMARY: Basic and clinical research is unraveling the pathophysiological mechanisms of critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy, and methods for rapid diagnosis are actively investigated. Future studies should better define the population at risk of developing CIM and CIP. In fact, although sepsis, multi-organ failure and steroids are often cited as risk factors, uncertainty remains due to the poor methodological quality of studies, or because of inferences that are exclusively based on animal studies. New simplified diagnostic techniques and machines for electrophysiological investigations of peripheral nerves and muscles in the intensive-care unit (ICU) patient would also be welcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccx.0000155357.24360.89

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Latronico, N., Peli, E., & Botteri, M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Published
2005-04
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
126-132
ISSN
1070-5295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035271040
Cited by
204
References
2
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccx.0000155357.24360.89
The paper
Latronico, N., Peli, E., & Botteri, M. (2005). Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy. Current Opinion in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccx.0000155357.24360.89

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.