Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Therapeutic results for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer with special reference to effectiveness of hepatectomy: analysis of prognostic factors for 763 cases recorded at 18 institutions.

Tomoyuki Kato, Kenzo Yasui, Takashi Hirai, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Takeo Mori, Kenichi Sugihara, Hidetaka Mochizuki, Junji Yamamoto·2003·PubMed

Abstract

PURPOSE: Factors affecting treatment prognosis and therapeutic results for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer were investigated. METHODS: Therapeutic results, especially of hepatectomy, were investigated for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer in 763 patients (585 underwent hepatectomy) treated between 1992 and 1996 at 18 institutions that participated in the "Study for establishing treatments for hepatic and pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer" sponsored by a Grant-in-Aid (10-11) for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor of Japan. RESULTS: The five-year survival rate for those treated by hepatectomy was significantly higher (32.9 percent) than for those not undergoing hepatectomy (3.4 percent). After hepatectomy for hepatic metastasis, the most prevalent form of recurrence was in the remnant liver (41.4 percent), followed by recurrence of pulmonary metastasis (19.2 percent), and other (7.2 percent). Factors of the primary tumor adversely affecting prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatic metastasis included poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma or mucinous carcinoma, depth of invasion of si/ai, lymph-node metastasis of Stage n3 and n4 by the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma, number of metastatic lymph nodes of more than four, and Dukes Stage D. Factors at the time of hepatectomy adversely affecting prognosis after surgery for hepatic metastasis included residual tumor, extrahepatic metastasis, hepatic metastasis of degree H3 stipulated by the Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma, number of metastases of four or more, pathology of hepatic metastasis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, resection margin of <10 mm, and carcinoembryonic antigen value higher than normal preoperative and one month postoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Among therapies for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer, the present study clearly revealed that hepatectomy is the treatment of choice whenever feasible. Postoperative recurrence often is localized in the remnant liver, or there may be a systemic recurrence of pulmonary metastasis. Thus, methods of prevention will be a future theme.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1097/01.dcr.0000089106.71914.00

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Kato, T., Yasui, K., Hirai, T., Kanemitsu, Y., Mori, T., Sugihara, K., Mochizuki, H., & Yamamoto, J.
Venue
PubMed
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
46
Issue
10 Suppl
Pages
S22-31
OpenAlex
W151970839
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapeutic results for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer with special reference to effectiveness of hepatectomy: analysis of prognostic factors for 763 cases recorded at 18 institutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.dcr.0000089106.71914.00
The paper
Kato, T., Yasui, K., Hirai, T., Kanemitsu, Y., Mori, T., Sugihara, K., Mochizuki, H., & Yamamoto, J. (2003). Therapeutic results for hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer with special reference to effectiveness of hepatectomy: analysis of prognostic factors for 763 cases recorded at 18 institutions. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.dcr.0000089106.71914.00

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.