Cited by 158Sperm and Testicular FunctionPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Does smoking during pregnancy affect sons’ sperm counts?

Storgaard, Lone, Peter Bonde, Jens, Ernst, Erik, Spanô, Marcello, Yding Andersen, Claus, Frydenberg, Morten, Olsen, Jørn·2003·Epidemiology

Abstract

Background.: There has been an apparent decline in sperm density during the last 5 decades in Denmark, a country in which women have among the highest rates of smoking in Europe. We examined semen quality and sex hormones in men in relation to their mothers’ tobacco smoking during pregnancy. Methods.: Male participants were selected from the population-based Danish Twin Registry and the Danish Civil Registration System as part of a study on hereditary and environmental determinants of semen quality. From November 1999 to May 2000 we collected one fresh semen and blood sample from each of 316 men. Data on prenatal tobacco exposure were obtained for 265 of these men from a questionnaire filled in by their mothers. Results.: Adjusting for age, current smoking status and other factors, sperm density was 48% lower (95% confidence interval = −69% to −11) among sons of mothers who smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day during pregnancy. Total sperm counts and levels of inhibin-B were also reduced among this group, whereas follicular stimulating hormone levels were somewhat higher (16% increase; 95% confidence interval = −13% to 54%). These effects were not seen in the lower smoking category (1–10 cigarettes per day). Conclusions.: High levels of smoking (>10 cigarettes per day) during pregnancy may be a partial explanation for the apparent secular decline and the geographic differences in sperm counts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ede.0000059922.73864.3e

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storgaard, L., Peter Bonde, J., Ernst, E., Spanô, M., Yding Andersen, C., Frydenberg, M., & Olsen, J.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Storgaard, Lone
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
2003-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
278-286
ISSN
  • 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5487
OpenAlex
W2024554347
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENEA Open Archive (National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Aarhus Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
smoking during pregnancy, prenatal tobacco exposure, sperm count, sperm concentration, semen quality, inhibin B, follicle-stimulating hormone, sex hormones, male fertility, Danish Twin Registry
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Denmark, Female, Humans, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Smoking, Sperm Count, Twins, Inhibin-beta Subunits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review