Cited by 151Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The impact of a decline in fecundity and of pregnancy postponement on final number of children and demand for assisted reproduction technology

Leridon, H., Slama, R.·2008·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past decades, the proportion of couples who resort to infertility treatment has tremendously increased, and fertility (the final number of children) sharply declined. We explored the roles of two potential causes of these trends: a temporal decline in the couples' fecundability and a postponement of age at initiation of pregnancy attempts. METHODS: We conducted a Monte-Carlo simulation for the reproductive history of 100,000 women based on the fertility and socio-demographic characteristics of the 1968 birth cohort in France. Declines in fecundability of various amplitudes have been implemented, as well as increases in the distribution of age at initiation of pregnancy attempts. RESULTS: A decline in fecundability by 15% implied a decrease in fertility by 4%, and an increase in the proportion of couples eligible for infertility treatments by 73%. An increase in the mean age at initiation of first pregnancy attempt by 2.5 years from 25 years entailed a decrease by 5% in fertility and an increase by 32% in the proportion of couples eligible for infertility treatments. CONCLUSION: A relatively important decrease in fecundability and an increase by 2.5 years in age at first pregnancy attempt are likely to have only a limited impact on fertility. However, they may have a large impact on the proportion of involuntarily infertile couples, likely to resort to assisted reproduction techniques.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/den106

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary studies point to the increasing contribution of fertility care to the overall population and the economic benefits for society that result from every new person born from fertility care.

    “Furthermore, preliminary studies point to the increasing contribution of fertility care to the overall population and the economic benefits for society that result from every new person born from fertility care (Connolly et al., 2008, 2009, 2021; Leridon and Slama, 2008;Habbema et al., 2009; Faddy et al., 2018).”

    From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Leridon and Slama, 2008

    The 'Impact of ART on fertility rate' section (page not available) models additional births from assisted reproduction, and the table discussed under 'Assumptions concerning the decline in fecundability' shows a small increase in total fertility when eligible couples use ART. The paper does not establish that fertility care's contribution to the population is increasing over time or assess the economic benefits of people born through fertility care. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bajos N, Leridon H, Job-Spira N. Contraception and abortion in France in the 2000s. Introduction. Population-E 2004;59:347-356.
  2. Belaisch-Allart J, Bachelot A, De Mouzon J, De Vecchi A, Renon C. Age et PMA. Contracept Fertil Sex 1997;25:503-506.
  3. Jacquard A. La reproduction humaine en re ´gime malthusien: un mode `le de simulation par la me ´thode de Monte Carlo. Population 1967;22:897-920.
  4. Prioux F. L'e ´volution de ´mographique re ´cente en France. Population 2001;56:571-610.
  5. Toulemon L, Leridon H. La famille ide ´ale: combien d'enfants, a `quel a ˆge ? INSEE-Premie `re 1999;652:1-4.
  6. Toulemon L, Mazuy M. Les naissances sont retarde ´es mais la fe ´condite ´est stable. Population 2001;4:611-644.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leridon, H., & Slama, R.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2008-04-11
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
1312-1319
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2135358455
Cited by
151
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Archined (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
fertility decline, involuntary infertility
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Female, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Male, Pregnancy, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review