Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability

Mena, Luis, Pintos, Salvador, Queipo, Nestor V, Aizpúrua, José A, Maestre, Gladys, Sulbarán, Tulio·2005·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study presents a reliable index inspired by the total variability concept of real analysis in mathematics, called average real variability (ARV), for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability (BPV) overcoming the pitfalls of the commonly used standard deviation (SD). BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that an increase in BPV is associated with an increase in subsequent cardiovascular events/complications. However, there are other studies where the cited association was not found or was lost in the presence of other well-known risk factors. An explanation for these apparently contradictory results may be the selection of the variability index used (SD). METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 312 subjects aged > or = 55 years. Logistic regression models and survival methods were used to establish the prognostic significance of awake systolic BPV: in particular, (i) the performance of ARV versus SD, and (ii) the value of BPV relative to other well-known risk factors. RESULTS: The analyses using the ARV index show a statistically significant relative risk equal to 4.548 (P = 0.006) for the group with high BPV with respect to the low BPV group (reference level); in contrast, the corresponding relative risk associated to the SD index was not statistically significant. Furthermore, ARV exhibited a similar predictive value to systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed ARV index is a more reliable representation of time series variability than SD and may be less sensitive to the relative low sampling frequency of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices. The results suggest that ARV adds prognostic value to the ABPM and could prompt the use of therapeutic measures to control BPV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.hjh.0000160205.81652.5a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Mena, L., Pintos, S., Queipo, N. V., Aizpúrua, J. A., Maestre, G., & Sulbarán, T.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2005-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
505-511
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165427196
Cited by
523
References
4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.hjh.0000160205.81652.5a
The paper
Mena, L., Pintos, S., Queipo, N. V., Aizpúrua, J. A., Maestre, G., & Sulbarán, T. (2005). A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000160205.81652.5a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.