The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regional disparities of hypertension prevalence and management within Germany
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate regional variations in the prevalence and management of hypertension in two communities in the north-east and the south-west of Germany. STUDY SETTING: Two population-based surveys of men and women aged 25-74 years, using a common standardized protocol: the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP; 3744 participants) and the Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA; 4224 participants). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of SHIP and KORA with regard to mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), prevalence of hypertension, percentage of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the community, by age and sex. RESULTS: The overall age-standardized prevalence of hypertension for men was 60.1% in SHIP and 41.4% in KORA; the corresponding values for women were 38.5 and 28.6%. Mean blood pressure differences were present in each 10-year age group and sex. The overall SBP difference between SHIP and KORA was 8.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval 7.2-9.3) in men and 6.3 mmHg (5.3-7.3) in women, the respective DBP differences were 3.8 mmHg (3.2-4.5) and 3.6 mmHg (3.0-4.2). Nevertheless, the percentage of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension was strikingly similar in the two studies (women, P = 0.858; and men, P = 0.564). CONCLUSIONS: The entire distribution of diastolic and systolic blood pressure values was shifted upwards in the north-eastern as compared to the south-western German population samples and the prevalences of hypertension differed accordingly. Despite such substantial epidemiologic differences, the community management of hypertension was of almost identical quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yusuf, S., Hawken, S., Ôunpuu, S., Dans, T., Avezum, A., Lanas, F., McQueen, M., Budaj, A., Pais, P., Varigos, J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17018-9 · Cited by 12,026
Cited by
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redon, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.3109/08037051.2013.812549 · Cited by 426
Fietze, I., Laharnar, N., Obst, A., Ewert, R., Felix, S. B., Garcia, C., Gläser, S., Glos, M., Schmidt, C. O., Stubbe, B., et al. (2019) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.12770 · Cited by 384
Self-citationIttermann, T., Thamm, M., Wallaschofski, H., Rettig, R., & Völzke, H. (2012) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2768 · Cited by 92
Self-citationDörr, M., Ittermann, T., Aumann, N., Obst, A., Reffelmann, T., Nauck, M., Wallaschofski, H., Felix, S. B., & Völzke, H. (2010) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03882.x · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meisinger, C., Heier, M., Völzke, H., Löwel, H., Mitusch, R., Hense, H.-W., & Lüdemann, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-299
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074865009
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional disparities of hypertension prevalence and management within Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.hjh.0000200508.10324.8e
- The paper
- Meisinger, C., Heier, M., Völzke, H., Löwel, H., Mitusch, R., Hense, H.-W., & Lüdemann, J. (2006). Regional disparities of hypertension prevalence and management within Germany. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000200508.10324.8e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.