Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regional disparities of hypertension prevalence and management within Germany

Meisinger, Christa, Heier, Margit, Völzke, Henry, Löwel, Hannelore, Mitusch, Rolf, Hense, Hans-Werner, Lüdemann, Jan·2006·Journal of Hypertension

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate regional variations in the prevalence and management of hypertension in two communities in the north-east and the south-west of Germany. STUDY SETTING: Two population-based surveys of men and women aged 25-74 years, using a common standardized protocol: the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP; 3744 participants) and the Kooperative Gesundheitsforschung in der Region Augsburg (KORA; 4224 participants). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of SHIP and KORA with regard to mean systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), prevalence of hypertension, percentage of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the community, by age and sex. RESULTS: The overall age-standardized prevalence of hypertension for men was 60.1% in SHIP and 41.4% in KORA; the corresponding values for women were 38.5 and 28.6%. Mean blood pressure differences were present in each 10-year age group and sex. The overall SBP difference between SHIP and KORA was 8.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval 7.2-9.3) in men and 6.3 mmHg (5.3-7.3) in women, the respective DBP differences were 3.8 mmHg (3.2-4.5) and 3.6 mmHg (3.0-4.2). Nevertheless, the percentage of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension was strikingly similar in the two studies (women, P = 0.858; and men, P = 0.564). CONCLUSIONS: The entire distribution of diastolic and systolic blood pressure values was shifted upwards in the north-eastern as compared to the south-western German population samples and the prevalences of hypertension differed accordingly. Despite such substantial epidemiologic differences, the community management of hypertension was of almost identical quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.hjh.0000200508.10324.8e

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Meisinger, C., Heier, M., Völzke, H., Löwel, H., Mitusch, R., Hense, H.-W., & Lüdemann, J.
Venue
Journal of Hypertension
Published
2006-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
293-299
ISSN
0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074865009
Cited by
160
References
2
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional disparities of hypertension prevalence and management within Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.hjh.0000200508.10324.8e
The paper
Meisinger, C., Heier, M., Völzke, H., Löwel, H., Mitusch, R., Hense, H.-W., & Lüdemann, J. (2006). Regional disparities of hypertension prevalence and management within Germany. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000200508.10324.8e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.