Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SHORT-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB (AVASTIN) FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

RICH, RYAN M., ROSENFELD, PHILIP J., PULIAFITO, CARMEN A., DUBOVY, SANDER R., DAVIS, JANET L., FLYNN, HARRY W., GONZALEZ, SERAFIN, FEUER, WILLIAM J., LIN, RICHARD C., LALWANI, GEETA A., NGUYEN, JACKIE K., KUMAR, GAURAV·2006·Retina

Abstract

In Brief Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech Inc.) for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Methods: A retrospective review was performed on consented patients with neovascular ARMD receiving intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. All patients received intravitreal bevacizumab at baseline with additional monthly injections given at the discretion of the treating physician. At each visit, a routine Snellen visual acuity assessment was performed followed by an ophthalmic examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Results: Fifty–three eyes of 50 patients received an intravitreal bevacizumab injection between May and August 2005. Including the month 3 visit, the average number of injections was 2.3 out of a maximum of 4 injections. No serious drug-related ocular or systemic adverse events were identified. Improvements in visual acuity and central retinal thickness measurements were evident by week 1 and continued through month 3. At month 3, the mean visual acuity improved from 20/160 to 20/125 (P<0.001) and the mean central retinal thickness decreased by 99.6 μm (P<0.001). Conclusion: Off-label intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for neovascular ARMD was well tolerated over 3 months with improvements in visual acuity and OCT central retinal thickness measurements. While the long-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab remain unknown, these short-term results suggest that intravitreal bevacizumab may be the most cost effective therapy for the treatment of neovascular ARMD. A retrospective review was performed on consecutively consented patients with neovascular ARMD receiving intravitreal bevacizumab therapy. While the long-term safety and efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab remain unknown, the short-term results suggest that intravitreal bevacizumab may be the most cost effective therapy for the treatment of neovascular ARMD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.iae.0000225766.75009.3a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
RICH, R. M., ROSENFELD, P. J., PULIAFITO, C. A., DUBOVY, S. R., DAVIS, J. L., FLYNN, H. W., GONZALEZ, S., FEUER, W. J., LIN, R. C., LALWANI, G. A., NGUYEN, J. K., & KUMAR, G.
Venue
Retina
Published
2006-05
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
495-511
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995708259
Cited by
484
References
4
FWCI
66.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SHORT-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB (AVASTIN) FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.iae.0000225766.75009.3a
The paper
RICH, R. M., ROSENFELD, P. J., PULIAFITO, C. A., DUBOVY, S. R., DAVIS, J. L., FLYNN, H. W., GONZALEZ, S., FEUER, W. J., LIN, R. C., LALWANI, G. A., NGUYEN, J. K., & KUMAR, G. (2006). SHORT-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB (AVASTIN) FOR NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iae.0000225766.75009.3a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.