The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis in North India
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the epidemiologic features and laboratory results of 191 consecutive cases of fungal keratitis presenting to a tertiary level superspecialty teaching hospital of North India. METHODS: A prospective hospital-based study was carried out on 485 consecutive patients presenting with corneal ulcers to the outpatient department of Guru Nanak Eye Center, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, from January 1999 to June 2001. The sociodemographic data, predisposing risk factors, clinical details, prior treatment modalities, laboratory results, and visual outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Diagnosis of mycotic keratitis was established in 191 (39%) out of the total study group of 485 cases. Direct microscopic examination of KOH mounts and Gram-stained smears revealed presence of fungal elements in the corneal scrapings in 119 (62.3%) and 114 (60%) of the subsequently fungal culture-positive cases, respectively. Men (68%) were more commonly affected by fungal keratitis than women (32%). Young adults 31-40 years of age were the most common age group to be involved (36%). Predisposing risk factors were noted in 79%, with corneal trauma 42%, contact lens wear 25%, and topical corticosteroids in 21% patients. The spectrum of fungi isolated were Aspergillus species in 78 (41%) followed by Curvularia species in 55 (29%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other studies from our subcontinent, we found Aspergillus niger to be the most common fungal isolate, followed by Curvularia species in culture-proven cases of fungal keratitis. Direct microscopic examination of KOH mounts emerged as a rapid, reliable, and inexpensive diagnostic modality, with a sensitivity of 62%, which would facilitate the institution of early antifungal therapy before the culture results became available, thus proving to be sight saving.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Upadhyay, M. P., Karmacharya, P. C. D., Koirala, S., Tuladhar, N. R., Bryan, L. E., Smolin, G., & Whitcher, J. P. (1991) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76903-x · Cited by 329
Cited by
A Hydrogel-Based Hybrid Theranostic Contact Lens for Fungal Keratitis
Huang, J.-F., Zhong, J., Chen, G.-P., Lin, Z.-T., Deng, Y., Liu, Y.-L., Cao, P.-Y., Wang, B., Wei, Y., Wu, T., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b00601 · Cited by 257
Fungal keratitis in the Republic of Ireland
Farrell, S., McElnea, E., Moran, S., Knowles, S., & Murphy, C. C. (2017) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2017.82 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Chowdhary, A., & Singh, K.
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-15
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081618734
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis in North India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ico.0000126435.25751.20
- The paper
- Chowdhary, A., & Singh, K. (2005). Spectrum of Fungal Keratitis in North India. Cornea. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000126435.25751.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.