The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Contour Tonometry: Presentation of a New Tonometer
Abstract
PURPOSE: With tonometers currently in use intraocular pressure is indirectly determined by measuring a physical quantity related to a specified deformation of the cornea. We present a new principle of direct, continuous, and transcorneal intraocular pressure measurement, describe its theoretical foundation, and evaluate its application on the basis of an in vitro model. METHODS: On a living human eye an optimized pressure-sensitive contact surface was determined by performing pressure measurements with differently shaped tonometer heads. Based on these results and on the theoretical model, a Dynamic Contour Tonometer was constructed and validated on eye bank bulbi against a manometric reference pressure. RESULTS: A concave contact surface with a radius of curvature of 10.5 mm creates a distribution of forces between the central contour matching area of the tip and the cornea that equals the forces generated by the internal pressure of the eye. A sensor integrated into the surface having the same contour measures the intraocular pressure closely to the manometric reference pressure in human cadaver eyes. The accuracy of the tonometer appears to be unaffected by variations in corneal properties. CONCLUSION: Dynamic Contour Tonometry eliminates most of the systematic errors arising from individual changes of corneal properties that adversely influence all types of applanation tonometers. The advantage of measuring the true pressure in combination with the capability of registering dynamic pressure fluctuations discloses new tonometric opportunities to diagnose and classify different types of glaucoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pepose, J. S., Feigenbaum, S. K., Qazi, M. A., Sanderson, J. P., & Roberts, C. J. (2007) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036 · Cited by 369
Ocular Pulse Amplitude in Healthy Subjects as Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry
Kaufmann, C. (2006) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.124.8.1104 · Cited by 154
Piso, D., Veiga-Crespo, P., & Vecino, E. (2012) · Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.4236/jbnb.2012.322037 · Cited by 22
“This technology has been proposed to continuously and accurately measure the IOP of structural characteristics of the cornea and sclera [18].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanngiesser, H. E., Kniestedt, C., & Robert, Y. C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Glaucoma
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 344-350
- ISSN
- 1057-0829
- OpenAlex
- W1978300670
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Contour Tonometry: Presentation of a New Tonometer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ijg.0000176936.16015.4e
- The paper
- Kanngiesser, H. E., Kniestedt, C., & Robert, Y. C. A. (2005). Dynamic Contour Tonometry: Presentation of a New Tonometer. Journal of Glaucoma. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000176936.16015.4e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.