Cited by 68Glaucoma and retinal disordersCorneal surgery and disordersGlutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms

Association of Apolipoprotein E Polymorphisms With Normal Tension Glaucoma in a Chinese Population

Lam, Ching Yan, Fan, Bao Jian, Wang, Dan Yi, Tam, Pancy Oi Sin, Yung Tham, Clement Chee, Leung, Dexter Yu Lung, Ping Fan, Dorothy Shu, Chiu Lam, Dennis Shun +1 more·2006·Journal of Glaucoma

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the role of apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphisms in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods A cohort of 400 unrelated Chinese POAG patients was examined, including 294 cases of high tension glaucoma (HTG) and 106 with normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Also studied were 300 unrelated Chinese control subjects. The genotypes of the APOE polymorphisms in exon 4 and in the promoter at positions -491, -427, and -219 were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. Frequencies of the genotypes were compared between patients and controls by chi test or Fisher exact test. The association of APOE polymorphisms with POAG phenotypes including age at diagnosis, intraocular pressure (IOP) at diagnosis, highest IOP, cup-disc ratio, and visual field score was investigated by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results No significant difference was detected in the frequencies of APOE promoter polymorphisms between POAG patients and control subjects (P>0.0125). For the exon 4 polymorphism, when compared with control subjects, the frequency of epsilon 4 carriers was significantly lower in patients with NTG (P=0.008; odds ratio=0.36, 95% confidence interval=0.17, 0.79) but not in HTG (P=0.07). Compared with -219TT, the -219G carriers had a significant higher age at diagnosis (P=0.0046). No significant association was found between other APOE polymorphisms and POAG phenotypes (P>0.07). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the APOE epsilon 4 allele co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212217.19804.a7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lam, C. Y., Fan, B. J., Wang, D. Y., Tam, P. O. S., Yung Tham, C. C., Leung, D. Y. L., Ping Fan, D. S., Chiu Lam, D. S., & Pang, C. P.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Journal of Glaucoma
Published
2006-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
218-222
ISSN
1057-0829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972971823
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Glaucoma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE polymorphism, normal-tension glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, high-tension glaucoma, APOE ε4, APOE promoter polymorphisms, genetic susceptibility, age at diagnosis, intraocular pressure, Chinese population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Apolipoproteins E, Child, Female, Genotype, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Hong Kong, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Asian People, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review