Cited by 283Nursing care and researchHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementHealth Education and Validation

Family Influences on Heart Failure Self-care and Outcomes

Open access
Dunbar, Sandra B., Clark, Patricia C., Quinn, Christina, Gary, Rebecca A., Kaslow, Nadine J.·2008·Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Abstract

Many patient education guidelines for teaching heart failure patients recommend inclusion of the family; however, family-focused interventions to promote self-care in heart failure are few. This article reviews the state of the science regarding family influences on heart failure self-care and outcomes. The literature and current studies suggest that family functioning, family support, problem solving, communication, self-efficacy, and caregiver burden are important areas to target for future research. In addition, heart failure patients without family and those who live alone and are socially isolated are highly vulnerable for poor self-care and should receive focused attention. Specific research questions based on existing science and gaps that need to be filled to support clinical practice are posed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jcn.0000305093.20012.b8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-management is defined by being set within the context of the family, being a lifelong dynamic process of self-monitoring and self-evaluation, and involving a perspectival shift from illness to wellness.

    “In addition to core tasks and skills, SM is defined by its being set within the context of the family7,8, by being a lifelong dynamic process of self-monitoring and self-evaluation2, and by involving a perspectival shift from illness to wellness4.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 283

Authors
Dunbar, S. B., Clark, P. C., Quinn, C., Gary, R. A., & Kaslow, N. J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2008-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
258-265
ISSN
0889-4655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089084955
Cited by
283
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 8800)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (F32NR009888, R01NR008800)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000039)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
heart failure, self-care, family influence, family functioning, family support, problem solving, family communication, self-efficacy, caregiver burden, living alone, social isolation, patient education, family intervention
MeSH terms
Communication, Family, Heart Failure, Humans, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Social Support, Health Behavior, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review