Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness
Open accessAbstract
With recent improvements in the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer, people with cancer are living longer, and their cancer may be managed as a chronic illness. Cancer as a chronic illness places new demands on patients and families to manage their own care, and it challenges old paradigms that oncology's work is done after treatment. As a chronic illness, however, cancer care occurs on a continuum that stretches from prevention to the end of life, with early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in between. In this article, self-management interventions that enable patients and families to participate in managing their care along this continuum are reviewed. Randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions with cancer patients and families in the treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life phases of the cancer care continuum are reviewed, and the Chronic Care Model is presented as a model of care that oncology practices can use to enable and empower patients and families to engage in self-management. It is concluded that the need for a common language with which to speak about self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care notwithstanding, oncology practices can now build strong relationships with their patients and formulate mutually agreed upon care plans that enable and empower patients to care for themselves in the way they prefer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 85 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The systematic review suggests that self-management interventions among cancer patients positively affect uncertainty.
“This systematic review suggests that SM interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress, uncertainty, problem-solving, communication, and general QOL domains, and potentially survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The systematic review suggests that self-management interventions among cancer patients potentially affect survival.
“This systematic review suggests that SM interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress, uncertainty, problem-solving, communication, and general QOL domains, and potentially survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The systematic review suggests that self-management interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress.
“This systematic review suggests that SM interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress, uncertainty, problem-solving, communication, and general QOL domains, and potentially survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The systematic review suggests that self-management interventions among cancer patients positively affect problem-solving.
“This systematic review suggests that SM interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress, uncertainty, problem-solving, communication, and general QOL domains, and potentially survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
All studies in Table 1 included interventions for improving communication with health care providers.
“All of the studies in Table 1 included interventions for improving communication with health care providers; for example, managing symptoms, expressing feelings, asking questions, and requesting help.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
The systematic review suggests that self-management interventions among cancer patients positively affect communication.
“This systematic review suggests that SM interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress, uncertainty, problem-solving, communication, and general QOL domains, and potentially survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The systematic review suggests that self-management interventions among cancer patients positively affect general quality-of-life domains.
“This systematic review suggests that SM interventions among cancer patients positively affect symptom distress, uncertainty, problem-solving, communication, and general QOL domains, and potentially survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Significant progress has been made in helping patients manage cancer symptoms during the treatment phase of the cancer-care continuum.
“Significant progress has been made in helping patients manage the symptoms associated with cancer during the treatment phase of the cancer-care continuum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Fewer studies have assessed the utility and benefit of self-management interventions during the post-treatment and end-of-life phases of the cancer-care continuum.
“Fewer studies have assessed the utility and benefit of SM interventions during the post-treatment and end-of-life phases of the continuum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The review of research to date suggests that self-management is critical across all phases of the cancer-care continuum.
“Our review of the research to date suggests that SM is critical across all the phases of the cancer-care continuum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The phase of the cancer-care continuum sets the context for patients' and families' preferences for managing their own care.
“The studies that have been conducted, however, suggest that the phase of the cancer-care continuum sets the context for patients' and families' preferences for how to manage their own care.”
- Also stated in: § Development of mutually determined care plans · plain
“The phase of the cancer-care continuum sets the context for individuals' preferences for how to manage their own care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Development of mutually determined care plans · plain
- Findingnone given
Self-management interventions have been part of this progress, including interventions focused on self-management of physical symptoms and psychosocial distress.
“SM interventions have been part of this progress, including interventions that have focused on SM of physical symptoms and psychosocial distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
McCorkle et al. examined the effects of a standard nursing intervention protocol (SNIP) delivered by advanced practice oncology nurses on older post-surgical cancer patients' physical, functional, emotional, and psychological recovery at home.
“We (McCorkle et al.)15 examined the effects of a standard nursing intervention protocol (SNIP) delivered by advanced practice oncology nurses on older post-surgical cancer patients' physical, functional, emotional, and psychological recovery in the home setting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] McCorkle, 2000, A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The Enhancing Connections Program was designed to address distress in mothers with breast cancer and negative adjustment of their school-age children.
“Recognizing the vulnerabilities of families and caregivers during the cancer treatment phase of the cancer-care continuum, the Enhancing Connections Program (EC)18 was designed to deal with the distress experienced by mothers with breast cancer and the negative adjustment of their school-age children.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Sikorskii, 2007, Symptom management for cancer patients: a trial comparing two multimodal interventions, J Pain Symptom Manage source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
McCorkle et al. conducted a randomized clinical trial with three intervention arms testing specialized oncology home care versus usual office care on QOL and dependency of individuals with progressive lung cancer.
“For example, we (McCorkle et al.)14 conducted a randomized clinical trial with three intervention arms testing the effect of a specialized oncology home care and usual office care on the QOL and level of dependency of individuals with progressive lung cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] McCorkle, 1989, A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients, Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The Given et al. study found decreased symptom severity for patients who entered the intervention with higher symptom severity (p=.01).
“The study found decreased symptom severity for patients who entered the intervention with higher symptom severity (p=.01) 16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] McCorkle, 2009, Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Older women in the study increased their weekly frequency and duration of physical activity (p≤.04).
“Moreover, the older women in the study increased their weekly frequency and duration of physical activity (p=≤.04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Damush, 2006, The implementation of an oncologist referred, exercise self-management program for older breast cancer survivors, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Evidence suggests that self-management strategies may benefit patients as they transition from the end of primary treatment to survivorship.
“Evidence suggests that SM strategies may benefit patients as they transition from the end of primary treatment to survivorship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In that trial, energy and fatigue of the SF-36 vitality subscale improved in the intervention group (p=.018).
“Energy and fatigue of the SF-36 vitality subscale improved in the intervention group (p=.018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Northouse, 2005, Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Stanton, 2005, Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Rummans et al. implemented a structured multidisciplinary intervention targeting five QOL domains (cognitive, emotional, physical, social, spiritual) with advanced cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.
“Rummans et al.24 implemented a structured multidisciplinary intervention targeting five QOL domains (cognitive, emotional, physical, social and spiritual) with advanced cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Rummans, 2006, Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A modified SNIP for post-surgical women with gynecological cancer significantly reduced uncertainty in the intervention group.
“For this group of women, the SNIP significantly reduced uncertainty in the intervention group; the intervention sub-group that received additional psychological support showed significant improvement in mental and physical QOL (p=.0001), less uncertainty (p=.0023),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] McCorkle, 2000, A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ganz et al. and Stanton conducted a multi-site randomized clinical trial of psychoeducation interventions on post-surgical breast cancer patients.
“Ganz et al. and Stanton20,21 conducted a multi-site randomized clinical trial of psychoeducation interventions on a cohort of post-surgical breast cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Northouse, 2005, Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Stanton, 2005, Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A modified SHIP intervention including content on early recognition and self-management of disabling symptoms resulted in significant improvement in fatigue, pain, and nausea (p=.04) among women in treatment for breast cancer with known depression.
“This modified intervention resulted in significant improvement in fatigue, pain, and nausea (p=.04) experienced by those women in treatment for breast cancer with known depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Badger, 2001, Depression burden, self-help interventions, and side effect experience in women receiving treatment for breast cancer, Oncol Nurs Forum
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Damush, Perkins, and Miller tested a self-management exercise program on older breast cancer survivors.
“One exception is the study by Damush, Perkins, and Miller23. Their study tested the effects of a SM exercise program on older breast cancer survivors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Damush, 2006, The implementation of an oncologist referred, exercise self-management program for older breast cancer survivors, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Process evaluations of Taking Charge revealed participants rated it as having high utility in dealing with their post-treatment concerns.
“Process evaluations of the program revealed that participants rated it as having high utility in dealing with their post-treatment concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Cimprich, 2005, Taking CHARGE: a self-management program for women following breast cancer treatment, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In that trial, the group receiving the education component reported significantly less cancer-related distress (p=.037) as measured by the SF-36 mental health subscale and CESD at six months.
“The group who received the education component reported significantly less cancer-related distress (p=.037) as measured by the SF-36 mental health subscale and CESD at six months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] Northouse, 2005, Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Stanton, 2005, Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cancer care occurs on a continuum from prevention through early detection, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care.
“The Institute of Medicine (IOM)'s 2005 report, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition1, identified six major phases on the cancer-care continuum: prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, and end-of-life care.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“As a chronic illness, however, cancer care occurs on a continuum that stretches from prevention to the end of life, with early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in between.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Hewitt, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Premisecitation
Family caregivers in the FOCUS intervention reported significantly less negative appraisal associated with caregiving (p=.04).
“family caregivers reported significantly less negative appraisal (p=.04) associated with caregiving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Lewis, 2006, The enhancing connections program: pilot study of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for mothers and children affected by breast cancer, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The PRO-SELF Pain Control Program supported patients in managing cancer-related bone pain by encouraging self-assessment, appropriate analgesic use, and around-the-clock dosing.
“The PRO-SELF Pain Control Program (PSPC) intervention supported patients in their management of cancer-related bone pain by encouraging patients to assess their pain themselves, to use appropriate analgesics, and to dose themselves around-the-clock in order to keep pain from worsening.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Miaskowski, 2004, Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The SNIP increased survival significantly for late-stage patients in the intervention group (p=.0001).
“The SNIP increased survival significantly for late-stage patients in the intervention group (p=.0001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] McCorkle, 2000, A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Given et al. developed a nurse-delivered intervention to reduce severity of 15 prevalent physical and psychological symptoms for patients with solid tumors receiving first-line chemotherapy.
“Given et al.16 built on previous psychoeducational and behavioral interventions for specific cancers and specific symptoms to develop a nurse-delivered intervention to reduce the severity of 15 prevalent physical and psychological symptoms for patients with a variety of solid tumors receiving chemotherapy for the first time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] McCorkle, 2009, Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Self-management interventions can enable and empower patients and families to participate in managing their care along the cancer-care continuum.
“In this paper, we review self-management interventions that enable patients and families to participate in managing their care along this continuum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The exercise program successfully reduced participants' perceived barriers to exercise (p≤.02).
“The exercise program successfully reduced participants' perceived barriers to exercise (p=≤.02).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Damush, 2006, The implementation of an oncologist referred, exercise self-management program for older breast cancer survivors, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The PRO-SELF Program was designed as a self-care intervention for common chemotherapy symptoms such as oral mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and infection.
“The PRO-SELF Program10, for example, was designed by oncology nurse researchers as a self-care intervention for common symptoms associated with chemotherapy, symptoms such as oral mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and infection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Dodd, 2000, The PRO-SELF Program: a self-care intervention program for patients receiving cancer treatment, Semin Oncol Nurs source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In cancer care, randomized trials have shown that clinicians with good communication skills and extra training in counseling methods such as motivational interviewing or cognitive behavioral therapy perform these functions well.
“In cancer care, several randomized trials have demonstrated that clinicians with good communication skills and additional training in counseling methods, methods such Motivational Interviewing (MI) or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), perform these functions well16,17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] McCorkle, 2009, Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Given, 2004, Effect of a cognitive behavioral intervention on reducing symptom severity during chemotherapy, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Sustained support is most efficiently provided within ongoing chronic-illness care.
“Such support is most efficiently provided in the context of ongoing chronic-illness care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Sustained support focused on helping patients manage their own illnesses may be optimal.
“However, sustained support focused on assisting patients in managing their own illnesses may be optimal37.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Bodenheimer, 2002, Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Even in advanced cancer, intervention patients reported stable QOL outcomes by four weeks compared to control group patients who experienced a significant decline in QOL at week four (p=.046).
“Even in the context of advanced cancer, the intervention patients reported stable QOL outcomes by four weeks in comparison to control group patients who experienced a significant decline in QOL at week four (p=.046).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Rummans, 2006, Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Project ENABLE, intervention patients had lower depressive symptoms (p=.02).
“Results of this study demonstrated higher QOL outcomes (p=.02), lower depressive symptoms (p.02), but limited decrease in symptom-intensity scores (p=.06) and health care service use (p=.14, days in the hospital, p=.53 for ER visits) on the part of intervention patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Bakitas, 2009, Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Chronically ill patients at higher risk of emergency room use, hospitalization, or major complications benefit from more intensive follow-up and clinical management by a care manager.
“Chronically ill patients at higher risk of emergency room use, hospitalization, or major complications have been shown to benefit from more intensive follow-up and clinical management by a care manager.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [28] Bodenheimer, 2002, Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Norris, 2002, Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control, Diabetes Care source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Bodenheimer, 2007, The teamlet model of primary care, Ann Fam Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Coleman, 2006, The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial, Arch Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Naylor, 2004, Transitional care for older adults: a cost-effective model, LDI Issue Brief
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Phillips, 2004, Comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Boyd, 2010, The effects of guided care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial, J Gen Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
These self-management interventions depend on oncology practices organizing themselves and functioning in a way that supports patients and families in their self-management efforts.
“These interventions, however, depend on oncology practices organizing themselves and functioning in a way that supports patients and families in their SM efforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Participants in the intervention group reported similar QOL scores at follow-up six months later (p=.992).
“Further, participants in the intervention group reported similar QOL scores at follow-up six months later (p=.992).24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Rummans, 2006, Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Time-limited courses led by peers or professionals and aimed at empowering patients to manage their illness have been shown to improve disease control.
“Time-limited courses facilitated by peer or professional leaders and focused on empowering patients to manage their own illness have been shown to improve disease control35,36.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [35] Hibbard, 2007, Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors?, Health Serv Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Anderson, 2005, Patient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm, Patient Educ Couns source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Expectations for patients and families to manage themselves have outpaced the development of effective self-management interventions.
“Expectations for patients and families to manage themselves have outpaced the development of effective SM interventions—interventions that impart the knowledge and skills and facilitate the social networking patients and families require for managing themselves2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Ryan, 2009, The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes, Nurs Outlook source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Intervention sessions addressed self-management components including goal-setting, taking charge, problem-solving, redirecting negative thoughts, building interpersonal relationships, and managing emotional and spiritual responses.
“Intervention sessions addressed components of SM, including goal-setting, taking charge, problem-solving, redirecting negative thoughts, building interpersonal relationships, and managing emotional and spiritual responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Rummans, 2006, Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
More recent evidence suggests that people with limited clinical training can be trained to provide the support needed to enable and empower patients to participate in self-management.
“More recent evidence suggests that individuals with limited clinical training can also be trained to provide the support necessary to enable and empower patients to participate in SM38.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Chodosh, 2005, Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults, Ann Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The role of nurses in delivering self-management interventions with positive outcomes has been confirmed in other studies.
“The role of nurses in delivering SM interventions with positive outcomes has been confirmed in other studies, as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Project ENABLE, intervention patients had only a limited decrease in health care service use (days in hospital p=.14; ER visits p=.53).
“Results of this study demonstrated higher QOL outcomes (p=.02), lower depressive symptoms (p.02), but limited decrease in symptom-intensity scores (p=.06) and health care service use (p=.14, days in the hospital, p=.53 for ER visits) on the part of intervention patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Bakitas, 2009, Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Project ENABLE, intervention patients had only a limited decrease in symptom-intensity scores (p=.06).
“Results of this study demonstrated higher QOL outcomes (p=.02), lower depressive symptoms (p.02), but limited decrease in symptom-intensity scores (p=.06) and health care service use (p=.14, days in the hospital, p=.53 for ER visits) on the part of intervention patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Bakitas, 2009, Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Project ENABLE, for newly diagnosed advanced cancer patients in rural settings, the APN intervention produced higher quality-of-life outcomes (p=.02).
“Results of this study demonstrated higher QOL outcomes (p=.02), lower depressive symptoms (p.02), but limited decrease in symptom-intensity scores (p=.06) and health care service use (p=.14, days in the hospital, p=.53 for ER visits) on the part of intervention patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Bakitas, 2009, Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Self-management may be more challenging at some phases of the cancer-care continuum than at others.
“However, SM may be more challenging at some phases compared to others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Linear sharing of information across providers or merely holding tumor boards is unlikely to satisfy patients' needs.
“Given this complexity, the linear sharing of information across providers or the mere holding of tumor boards will unlikely satisfy patients' needs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The demands patients experience within a particular phase may influence how much they participate in self-management interventions.
“The demands patients experience within a particular phase may influence their level of participation in SM interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Degner and colleagues successfully determined patients' preferences for participating in decision-making about treatment options.
“Degner and colleagues47,48 have successfully determined patients' preferences to participate in the decision-making related to treatment options.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] McCorkle, 1994, The impact of posthospital home care on patients with cancer, Res Nurs Health source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [48] Bandura A Organizational functioning Bandura A New York W.H. Freeman 1997 472 604
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Effective chronic-care management depends on careful and proactive follow-up by practice teams, tailored to each patient's disease severity and preferences.
“Effective chronic-care management also depends on careful and proactive follow-up by practice teams—follow-up tailored to each patient's disease severity and preferences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many clinicians lack the time and expertise needed to train and counsel patients effectively.
- Interpretationnone given
Another limitation of self-management in the cancer-care continuum is the lack of a common set of actions to teach patients and families how to care for themselves.
“Another limitation of SM in the context of the cancer-care continuum is the lack of a common set of actions to teach patients and families how to take care of themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Daily self-management behaviors may change depending on where patients are on the cancer-care continuum, their treatment, symptoms, personal goals, and ability to care for themselves.
“These daily behaviors may change; for depending upon where patients are on the cancer-care continuum, the cancer treatment they undergo, their symptoms, their personal goals, and their ability to take care of themselves may also change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 32
- May combine two claims. 24
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenOver the last two decades, a number of intervention studies have demonstrated significant improvements in patients' outcomes at different phases of the cancer-care continuum.
“Over the last two decades, a number of intervention studies have demonstrated significant improvements in patients' outcomes at different phases on the cancer-care continuum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenResearch on self-management interventions in cancer care has increased over the last decade.
“Research related to SM interventions in cancer care has increased over the last decade.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA major limitation in establishing self-management and the Chronic Care Model in cancer care has been the lack of a common language.
“A major limitation in establishing SM and the CCM in cancer care heretofore has been the lack of a common language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the EC Program, participants' pre- and post-test measures of depression (p=.03), anxiety (p=.02), and self-confidence (p=.006) improved significantly.
“Participants' pre- and post-test measures of depression (p=.03), anxiety (p=.02), and self-confidence (p=.006) improved significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Sikorskii, 2007, Symptom management for cancer patients: a trial comparing two multimodal interventions, J Pain Symptom Manage source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCancer as a chronic illness creates new demands on patients and families to manage their own care and challenges the old paradigm that oncology's work ends after treatment.
“Cancer as a chronic illness places new demands on patients and families to manage their own care, and it challenges old paradigms that oncology's work is done after treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Improvements in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment have led to more people living longer with cancer and cancer being managed as a chronic illness.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationcitationThe effect sizes for NASM and ATSM are just above the median in Cohen's classification, yielding clinically significant improvement over baseline.
“The effect sizes are just above the median in Cohen's classification, thus yielding clinically significant improvement over baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatients in the specialized oncology home care intervention had less distress (p=.03) and greater independence (p=.02) than participants in the usual care group, even in the context of advancing disease.
“We found that even in the context of advancing disease, patients in the specialized oncology home care intervention had less distress (p=.03) and greater independence (p=.02) than participants in the usual care group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] McCorkle, 1989, A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients, Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SHIP study found participants demonstrated increased levels of self-care, self-help, psychological adjustment, and confidence in cancer knowledge (p≤.003).
“Their study found that participants demonstrated increased levels of self-care, self-help, psychological adjustment, and confidence in cancer knowledge (p=≤.003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Braden, 1998, Self-Help Intervention Project. Women receiving breast cancer treatment, Cancer Pract source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe Chronic Care Model can be used by oncology practices to enable and empower patients and families to engage in self-management.
“We also present the Chronic Care Model as a model of care that oncology practices can use to enable and empower patients and families to engage in self-management.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
“We use the Chronic Care Model as a paradigm for oncology practices to use in order to enable and empower patients to engage in SM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe initial PRO-SELF intervention did not show a statistically significant difference between experimental and control groups in reducing symptom severity, but participants reported benefit.
“Although the initial intervention did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups in reducing symptom severity, participants reported benefit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Dodd, 2000, The PRO-SELF Program: a self-care intervention program for patients receiving cancer treatment, Semin Oncol Nurs source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParticipants in the experimental arm of the PSPC reported significantly less pain intensity than control participants (p≤.001) and used more appropriate pain medications over time.
“Participants in the experimental arm of the PSPC reported significantly less pain intensity than control participants (p=≤.001) and used more appropriate pain medications than control group participants over time11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Miaskowski, 2004, Randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self-care intervention to improve cancer pain management, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWomen who participated in the FOCUS intervention reported significantly less hopelessness (p=.002) and less negative appraisal (p=.04) than women who did not receive the intervention.
“Women who participated in the FOCUS intervention reported significantly less hopelessness (p=.002) and less negative appraisal (p=.04) than women who did not receive the intervention”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Lewis, 2006, The enhancing connections program: pilot study of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for mothers and children affected by breast cancer, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBraden, Mishel & Longman tested a self-help intervention protocol (SHIP) with women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment to increase knowledge, improve problem-solving, redirect negative thinking, promote communication, and minimize uncertainty.
“To address these issues Braden, Mishel & Longman12 tested the effects of a self-help intervention protocol (SHIP) with women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment, the purpose of which was to increase knowledge about cancer, improve problem-solving, redirect negative thinking, promote effective communication with health care professionals, and to minimize uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Braden, 1998, Self-Help Intervention Project. Women receiving breast cancer treatment, Cancer Pract source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThirty-two intervention studies were identified; after exclusions, 16 studies were reviewed.
“Thirty-two intervention studies were identified. Of the 32 intervention studies, ten either mixed or did not report phase of treatment, did not include description of the intervention, or were not randomized; these were excluded. Of the remaining 22, six studies were co-authored by the investigators included in this review; only one example of their work was included. The remaining 16 reviewed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOncology practices can now build strong relationships with patients and formulate mutually agreed care plans that enable and empower patients to care for themselves as they prefer.
“We conclude that, the need for a common language by which to speak about self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care notwithstanding, oncology practices can now build strong relationships with their patients and formulate mutually-agreed upon care plans that enable and empower patients to care for themselves in the way they prefer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There is a need for a common language for discussing self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA later modification compared a nurse-assisted symptom management protocol (NASM) with an automated-telephone symptom-management protocol (ATSM); both resulted in clinically significant reduction in symptom severity with nearly identical effect sizes (0.56 NASM, 0.59 ATSM).
“Both the NASM and ATSM interventions resulted in a clinically significant reduction in symptom severity. The effect sizes were basically identical (0.56 NASM, 0.59, ATSM) 17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Given, 2004, Effect of a cognitive behavioral intervention on reducing symptom severity during chemotherapy, J Clin Oncol source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe FOCUS study tested whether women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers reported better QOL compared to other patients and families not participating in FOCUS.
“In another study, the FOCUS (family involvement, optimistic attitude, coping, effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management) study19 tested whether women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers reported better QOL compared to other patients and families not participating in FOCUS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Lewis, 2006, The enhancing connections program: pilot study of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for mothers and children affected by breast cancer, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Taking Charge intervention, based on self-management principles, aimed to help women with breast cancer address concerns associated with the end of primary treatment and post-treatment life experiences.
“The aim of the Taking Charge intervention22, based on principles inherent in SM, was to help a group of women with breast cancer address and overcome concerns associated with the end of primary treatment and concerns about life experiences in the post-treatment phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Cimprich, 2005, Taking CHARGE: a self-management program for women following breast cancer treatment, Psychooncology source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the EC Program, mothers and fathers reported significant decreases in their children's behavioral problems, and children reported less cancer-related worry (p=.04).
“Mothers and fathers also reported significant decreases in their children's behavioral problems. The children themselves reported less cancer-related worry (p=.04).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Sikorskii, 2007, Symptom management for cancer patients: a trial comparing two multimodal interventions, J Pain Symptom Manage source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningNew models of cancer care must enable oncology providers to form partnerships with patients, families, and other providers such as primary care clinicians.
“New models must enable oncology providers to form partnerships with patients and families, and other providers, such as primary care clinicians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe aim of self-management is keeping wellness in one's psychological foreground.
“Lorig and Holman identify the aim of SM as keeping wellness in one's psychological foreground.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Lorig, 2003, Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSelf-management has come of age after more than four decades of scientific consideration.
“The concept of SM has come of age after more than four decades of scientific consideration2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Ryan, 2009, The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes, Nurs Outlook source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo accomplish self-management tasks, people with chronic illness need core skills: problem-solving, decision-making, resource utilization, forming partnerships with health care providers, and taking action.
“To accomplish these tasks, people with chronic illness need the following core SM skills: problem-solving, decision-making, resource utilization, forming partnerships with health care providers, and taking action4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Lorig, 2003, Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe management of care overlaps among patients, providers, and health care systems, and these complexities demand new models of care.
“Because of this, the management of care overlaps among patients, providers, and health care systems. The complexities of these overlaps demand new models of care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWagner developed the Chronic Care Model in the 1990s to help medical practices improve the quality of care for patients with chronic illness.
“Based on this evidence, we (Wagner) developed the Chronic Care Model in the 1990s to help medical practices improve the quality of their care to patients with chronic illness30.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Tsai, 2005, A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses, Am J Manag Care
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPeople with chronic illness have three self-management tasks: managing medical aspects, managing life roles including changes brought on by illness, and managing psychological consequences.
“To do this, the person with chronic illness has three SM tasks, which were originally described by Corbin and Strauss5: managing the medical aspects of the illness; managing life roles, including changes in roles brought on by the illness; and managing the psychological consequences of chronic illness6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Corbin, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLong-term cancer care necessitates discussing patients' short-term and long-term goals and including these goals in action plans to the degree they are medically realistic.
“This longer term necessitates discussing patients' short-term and long-term goals and including these goals in action plans to the degree they are medically realistic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinical care management includes clinical assessment, medication management, self-management support, and care coordination, including among post-surgical cancer patients.
“Clinical care management, generally provided by a health care professional such as a nurse or clinical pharmacist, includes clinical assessment, medication management, self-management support, and care coordination28,39-44, including among post-surgical cancer patients14,15,45.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 10 sources checked- cites [28] Bodenheimer, 2002, Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Norris, 2002, Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control, Diabetes Care source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Bodenheimer, 2007, The teamlet model of primary care, Ann Fam Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Coleman, 2006, The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial, Arch Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Naylor, 2004, Transitional care for older adults: a cost-effective model, LDI Issue Brief
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [43] Phillips, 2004, Comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Boyd, 2010, The effects of guided care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial, J Gen Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14] McCorkle, 1989, A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients, Cancer source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] McCorkle, 2000, A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients, J Am Geriatr Soc source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Gensichen, 2009, Case management for depression by health care assistants in small primary care practices: a cluster randomized trial, Ann Intern Med source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningLong-term planning requires an ongoing collaborative relationship between patients and providers instead of an acute, prescriptive relationship.
“This kind of long-term planning requires an ongoing collaborative relationship between patients and providers instead of an acute, prescriptive relationship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe cancer-care continuum challenges the paternalistic paradigm in which providers tell patients what to do and expect adherence.
“The notion of the cancer-care continuum challenges this paternalistic paradigm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAll definitions of self-management are broader than merely following medical advice.
“SM has been variously defined, but all definitions are broader than the mere following of medical advice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe 2005 IOM report emphasized the importance of explicit care plans.
“The 2005 IOM report emphasized the importance of explicit care plans1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Hewitt, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelf-management is defined by being set within the context of the family, being a lifelong dynamic process of self-monitoring and self-evaluation, and involving a perspectival shift from illness to wellness.
“In addition to core tasks and skills, SM is defined by its being set within the context of the family7,8, by being a lifelong dynamic process of self-monitoring and self-evaluation2, and by involving a perspectival shift from illness to wellness4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [2] Ryan, 2009, The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes, Nurs Outlook source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Lorig, 2003, Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Dunbar, 2008, Family influences on heart failure self-care and outcomes, J Cardiovasc Nurs source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Grey, 2006, A framework for the study of self- and family management of chronic conditions, Nurs Outlook source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIt is impossible not to manage one's health, and for those with a chronic illness, self-management is a lifetime task.
“Lorig and Holman4 point out that, even if one does not have a chronic condition, it is impossible not to manage one's health; however, if one does have a chronic illness, SM is a “lifetime task” (p. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Lorig, 2003, Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms, Ann Behav Med source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA variety of interventions and changes to the organization and functioning of medical practice have proven to help patients meet their needs and improve care and outcomes across chronic diseases.
“A variety of interventions and changes to the organization and functioning of medical practice have proven to help patients meet their needs and to improve care and outcomes across chronic diseases26-29.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [26] Ganz, 2004, Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Renders, 2001, Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Bodenheimer, 2002, Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Shojania, 2006, Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis, JAMA source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCommunity-based programs and organizations are another way to enable and empower patients and often most effectively meet many needs of chronically ill patients.
“Another way to enable and empower patients is to use community-based programs and organizations, which often most effectively meet many of the needs of chronically ill patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many clinical practices lack sufficient time and information to help patients with community-based services.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCare plans form the bond that holds together the partnership between patients and practice teams, and they must be mutually determined.
“Care plans form the bond that holds together the partnership between patients and practice teams, but they must be mutually determined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningDeveloping and maintaining care plans makes it possible for practice teams to serve as patients' champions.
“Developing and maintaining care plans make it possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe oncology setting presents many more challenges because of the number of specialties that must be organized and integrated into care.
“In particular, there are many more challenges in the oncology setting given the number of specialties that have to be organized and integrated into the care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSelf-management interventions are fundamental to enabling and empowering patients to care for themselves along the cancer-care continuum in the way they prefer.
“SM interventions are fundamental to enabling and empowering patients so they can take care of themselves along the cancer-care continuum in the way they prefer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPatients may become more passive during active, aggressive treatment because they are physically or emotionally overwhelmed, while during the post-treatment phase they may feel better and want to manage treatment and surveillance demands independently.
“Patients may become more passive during active, aggressive treatment due to being physically or emotionally overwhelmed; whereas during the post-treatment phase they may feel better physically and may want to manage the demands associated with their cancer treatment and surveillance schedule independently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe disease itself may increase patients' distress, but fragmentation of care adds to it.
“The disease itself may increase patients' distress, but this fragmentation of care adds to it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Primary care providers often feel they lack enough information to answer cancer patients' questions.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTo be competent and confident managers, patients must have the relevant information and skills to set priorities and manage their illness.
“To be competent and confident managers, patients must have the relevant information and skills to set priorities and manage their illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenPatients' self-management needs are met through productive interactions between patients and families and their practice team.
“Patients' SM needs are met through productive interactions between patients and families and their practice team.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCare plans developed collaboratively with patients produce informed and enabled patients and contribute to better coordination of care.
“Care plans developed collaboratively with patients make for informed and enabled patients, and they contribute to better coordination of care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenProductive interactions are more likely when patients actively participate, are invested in their own care, and are competent and confident managers of their health and illness.
“Productive interactions are more likely to occur when patients actively participate and are invested in their own care and are competent, confident managers of their health and illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe delivery of quality cancer care depends on productive interactions between patients and providers.
“The delivery of quality cancer care is dependent on productive interactions between patients and providers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe specialties involved may change as patients progress along the cancer-care continuum.
“These specialties may change as patients progress along the cancer-care continuum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Improvements in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment have led to more people living longer with cancer and cancer being managed as a chronic illness.
“With recent improvements in early detection, diagnosis and treatment of cancer, people with cancer are living longer, and their cancer may be managed as a chronic illness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients are expected to assume a greater role in managing their follow-up care because of ongoing survivorship and insurance coverage shifts that limit time with providers.
“With ongoing survivorship and current shifts in insurance coverage that limit time with providers, patients are expected to assume a greater role in managing their follow-up care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a need for a common language for discussing self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care.
“the need for a common language by which to speak about self-management and a common set of self-management actions for cancer care notwithstanding”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy have become safe enough to require less intensive monitoring by health care professionals, leading outpatient clinics to replace hospitals as delivery settings.
“When cancer treatments such as chemo- and radiation-therapy proved to be safe enough so as to require less intensive monitoring by health care professionals, the outpatient clinic replaced the hospital as the delivery setting.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The needs of patients and families living with advanced cancer intensify as death grows closer, and physical changes result in loss of capacity to manage medical regimens and activities of daily living.
“The needs of patients and families living with advanced cancer intensify as death grows closer. The physical changes associated with a disease that is unable to be controlled results in loss of the capacity to manage aspects of medical regimens and activities of daily living.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Health care professionals and researchers recognize that increasing symptom burden does not preclude patients from acting on their own behalf to maintain QOL, independence, and support for preferences about dying.
“Health care professionals and researchers recognize that the inevitable increasing symptom burden does not preclude patients acting on their own behalf in terms of maintaining a reasonable QOL, maintaining their current level of independence, and obtaining support for their preferences about their dying course and letting go.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Most people want to take care of themselves and remain independent, though these preferences may change over time.
“It is assumed that most people want to take care of themselves and remain independent, but these preferences may change over time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many problems cancer survivors face involve stress, depression, sleeplessness, fear, and a lack of decision-making skills about resuming a changed life.
“Many of the problems survivors face involve stress, depression, sleeplessness, fear, and lack of skills in making decisions about how to resume a normal-but-changed life.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many cancer survivors must cope with changes in body image or treatment side-effects such as incontinence or lymphedema.
“In addition, many survivors must cope with changes in body image or side-effects of treatment, such as incontinence or lymphedema.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cancer often changes survivors' relationships with family and friends.
“Finally, cancer often causes changes in relationships with family and friends.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many clinicians lack the time and expertise needed to train and counsel patients effectively.
“Yet many clinicians have neither the time nor the expertise necessary to train and counsel patients effectively.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many clinical practices lack sufficient time and information to help patients with community-based services.
“Many clinical practices, however, do not have enough time and information to assist patients with such services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Primary care providers often feel they lack enough information to answer cancer patients' questions.
“While it is true that PCPs must play a major role in coordinating care, PCPs often feel as if they do not have enough information to answer cancer patients' questions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The intervention is based on the Chronic Care Self-Management Model.
“The intervention is based on the Chronic Care Self-Management Model (CCM), which aims to empower patients, build self-efficacy, and improve outcomes through proactive planning and skills building [15].”
From Pilot study of a telehealth perioperative physical activity intervention for older adults with cancer and their caregivers (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835 · see citing works
Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms
Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. R. (2003) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2601_01 · Cited by 4,094 · see citing works
Self-citationPatient Self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469 · Cited by 3,598 · cited 1× · see citing works
“focused on empowering patients to manage their own illness have been shown to improve disease control.(37,38) However, sustained support focused on assisting patients in managing their own illness may be optimal.”
BackgroundImproving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., & Bonomi, A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 · Cited by 3,446 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & Korff, M. V. (1996) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3350391 · Cited by 2,877 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review
Barlow, J., Wright, C., Sheasby, J., Turner, A., & Hainsworth, J. (2002) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00032-0 · Cited by 2,800 · see citing works
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness: The Chronic Care Model, Part 2
Bodenheimer, T., Wagner, E. H., & Grumbach, K. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.15.1909 · Cited by 2,413 · see citing works
Self-citationChronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?
Eh, W. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,095 · see citing works
The Care Transitions Intervention: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Coleman, E. A., Parry, C., Chalmers, S., & Min, S.-J. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1822 · Cited by 1,937 · see citing works
Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Norris, S. L., Lau, J., Smith, S. J., Schmid, C. H., & Engelgau, M. M. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
Bakitas, M., Lyons, K. D., Hegel, M. T., Balan, S., Brokaw, F. C., Seville, J., Hull, J. G., Li, Z., Tosteson, T. D., Byock, I. R., et al. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1198 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium
Coleman, K., Austin, B. T., Brach, C., & Wagner, E. H. (2009) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75 · Cited by 1,606 · see citing works
Self-citationInformation Needs and Decisional Preferences in Women With Breast Cancer
Degner, L. F. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540420081039 · Cited by 1,119 · see citing works
Renders, C. M., Valk, G. D., Griffin, S. J., Wagner, E. H., Eijk van, J. T., & Assendelft, W. J. J. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Self-citationDecision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play?
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9 · Cited by 1,012 · see citing works
Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors?
Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stock, R., & Tusler, M. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00669.x · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Ryan, P., & Sawin, K. J. (2009) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults
Chodosh, J., Morton, S. C., Mojica, W., Maglione, M., Suttorp, M. J., Hilton, L., Rhodes, S., & Shekelle, P. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007 · Cited by 790 · cited 1× · see citing works
“focused on empowering patients to manage their own illness have been shown to improve disease control.(37,38) However, sustained support focused on assisting patients in managing their own illness may be optimal.”
BackgroundPatient empowerment: reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm
Anderson, R. M., & Funnell, M. M. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.05.008 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Ganz, P. A., Kwan, L., Stanton, A. L., Krupnick, J. L., Rowland, J. H., Meyerowitz, B. E., Bower, J. E., & Belin, T. R. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh060 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Renders, C. M., Valk, G. D., Griffin, S. J., Wagner, E. H., van Eijk, J. T. M., & Assendelft, W. J. (2000) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001481 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Self-citationA meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses.
Tsai, A. C., Morton, S. C., Mangione, C. M., & Keeler, E. B. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Rummans, T. A., Clark, M. M., Sloan, J. A., Frost, M. H., Bostwick, J. M., Atherton, P. J., Johnson, M. E., Gamble, G., Richardson, J., Brown, P., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.209 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Northouse, L., Kershaw, T., Mood, D., & Schafenacker, A. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.871 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
McCorkle (2000) · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03886.x · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationFamily Influences on Heart Failure Self-care and Outcomes
Dunbar, S. B., Clark, P. C., Quinn, C., Gary, R. A., & Kaslow, N. J. (2008) · Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.jcn.0000305093.20012.b8 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
The teamlet model of primary care
Bodenheimer, T., & Laing, B. Y. (2007) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.731 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
A framework for the study of self- and family management of chronic conditions
Grey, M., Knafl, K., & McCorkle, R. (2006) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2006.06.004 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationMiaskowski, C., Dodd, M., West, C., Schumacher, K., Paul, S. M., Tripathy, D., & Koo, P. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.06.140 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Stanton, A. L., Ganz, P. A., Kwan, L., Meyerowitz, B. E., Bower, J. E., Krupnick, J. L., Rowland, J. H., Leedham, B., & Belin, T. R. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.09.101 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Gensichen, J., von Korff, M., Peitz, M., Muth, C., Beyer, M., Güthlin, C., Torge, M., Petersen, J. J., Rosemann, T., König, J., et al. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-00001 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer
Degner, L. F. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.18.1485 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Effect of a cognitive behavioral intervention on reducing symptom severity during chemotherapy
Given, C., Given, B., Rahbar, M., Jeon, S., McCorkle, R., Cimprich, B., Galecki, A., Kozachik, S., Brady, A., Fisher-Malloy, M. J., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.01.241 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationBoyd, C. M., Reider, L., Frey, K., Scharfstein, D., Leff, B., Wolff, J., Groves, C., Karm, L., Wegener, S., Marsteller, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1192-5 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
McCorkle, R., Dowd, M., Ercolano, E., Schulman‐Green, D., Williams, A., Siefert, M. L., Steiner, J., & Schwartz, P. (2009) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1365 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationTaking CHARGE: a self-management program for women following breast cancer treatment
Cimprich, B., Janz, N. K., Northouse, L., Wren, P. A., Given, B., & Given, C. W. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.891 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Badger, T. A., Braden, C. J., & Mishel, M. H. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Symptom management for cancer patients: a trial comparing two multimodal interventions
Sikorskii, A., Given, C. W., Given, B., Jeon, S., Decker, V., Decker, D., Champion, V., & McCorkle, R. (2007) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.018 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationLewis, F. M., Casey, S. M., Brandt, P. A., Shands, M. E., & Zahlis, E. H. (2006) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.979 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-Help Intervention Project. Women receiving breast cancer treatment
Braden, C., Mishel, M., & Longman, A. (1998) · Cancer Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.1998.1998006087.x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The PRO-SELF Program: a self-care intervention program for patients receiving cancer treatment
Dodd, M. J., & Miaskowski, C. (2000) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1053/sonu.2000.16586 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Damush, T. M., Perkins, A., & Miller, K. (2006) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1020 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Transitional care for older adults: a cost-effective model.
Naylor, M. D. (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The impact of posthospital home care on patients with cancer
McCorkle, R., Jepson, C., Malone, D., Buhler‐Wilkerson, K., Lusk, E., Braitman, L., & Daly, J. (1994) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770170403 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationTransitional care for older adults: a cost-effective model.
Naylor (2004) · PubMed · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Landis, S. E., Gaynes, B. N., MORRISSEY, J. P., Vinson, N., Ellis, A. R., & Domino, M. E. (2007) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-8-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Phillips, C. O., Wright, S. M., Kern, D. E., Singa, R. M., Shepperd, S., & Rubin, H. R. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.11.1358 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Shojania, K. G., Ranji, S. R., McDonald, K. M., Grimshaw, J. M., Sundaram, V., Rushakoff, R. J., & Owens, D. K. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.4.427 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients
McCorkle, R., Benoliel, J. Q., Donaldson, G., Georgiadou, F., Moinpour, C., & Goodell, B. (1989) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19890915)64:6
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Hewitt, 2005, Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving Care and Quality of Life. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition, 506
- Corbin, 1988, Understanding Work and Care: Managing Chronic Illness at Home
- 2004, Report of a Summit. The 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit- A Focus on Communities
- 2003, Institute of Medicine: Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Castro, E. M., Regenmortel, T. V., Vanhaecht, K., Sermeus, W., & Hecke, A. V. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis
Levit, L. A., Balogh, E. P., Nass, S. J., & Ganz, P. A. (2014) · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Niedzwiedz, C. L., Knifton, L., Robb, K. A., Katikireddi, S. V., & Smith, D. J. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6181-4 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment
Sarfati, D., Koczwara, B., & Jackson, C. (2016) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21342 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Processes of Self‐Management in Chronic Illness
Schulman‐Green, D., Jaser, S., Martin, F., Alonzo, A., Grey, M., McCorkle, R., Redeker, N. S., Reynolds, N., & Whittemore, R. (2012) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01444.x · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Self-citationTaylor, S. J., Pinnock, H., Epiphaniou, E., Pearce, G., Parke, H. L., Schwappach, A., Purushotham, N., Jacob, S., Griffiths, C. J., Greenhalgh, T., et al. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02530 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Defining cancer survivors, their needs, and perspectives on survivorship health care in the USA
Mayer, D. K., Nasso, S. F., & Earp, J. A. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30573-3 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Cancer Survivors’ Experience With Telehealth: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.
Cox, A., Lucas, G., Marcu, A., Piano, M., Grosvenor, W., Mold, F., Maguire, R., & Ream, E. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6575 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
A metasynthesis of factors affecting self‐management of chronic illness
Schulman‐Green, D., Jaser, S. S., Park, C., & Whittemore, R. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12902 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationKleckner, I. R., Kamen, C. S., Gewandter, J. S., Mohile, N. A., Heckler, C. E., Culakova, E., Fung, C., Janelsins, M. C., Asare, M., Lin, P., et al. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-4013-0 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Self-management education interventions for patients with cancer: a systematic review
Howell, D., Harth, T., Brown, J., Bennett, C., & Boyko, S. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3500-z · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Kemp, E., Trigg, J. L., Beatty, L., Christensen, C., Dhillon, H. M., Maeder, A. J., Williams, P. A. H., & Koczwara, B. (2020) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.387 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Nekhlyudov, L., O'malley, D. M., & Hudson, S. V. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30570-8 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Beyond treatment – Psychosocial and behavioural issues in cancer survivorship research and practice
Aaronson, N. K., Mattioli, V., Minton, O., Weis, J., Johansen, C., Dalton, S. O., Leeuw, I. M. V., Stein, K., Alfano, C. M., Mehnert, A., et al. (2014) · European Journal of Cancer Supplements · doi:10.1016/j.ejcsup.2014.03.005 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Howell, D., Mayer, D. K., Fielding, R., Eicher, M., Leeuw, I. M. V., Johansen, C., Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, E., Foster, C. N., Chan, R. J., Alfano, C. M., et al. (2020) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa083 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Follow-up care of cancer survivors: challenges and solutions
Jacobs, L. A., & Shulman, L. N. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30386-2 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Chirico, A., Lucidi, F., Merluzzi, T. V., Alivernini, F., Laurentiis, M. D., Botti, G., & Giordano, A. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15758 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Stanton, A. L., Rowland, J. H., & Ganz, P. A. (2015) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0037875 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
van den Berg, S. W., Gielissen, M. F. M., Custers, J. A. E., van der Graaf, W. T. A., Ottevanger, P. B., & Prins, J. B. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.54.9386 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Warrington, L., Absolom, K. L., Conner, M. T., Kellar, I., Clayton, B., Ayres, M., & Velikova, G. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10875 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Jansen, F., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., van Zwieten, V., Witte, B. I., & Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M. (2015) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
van der Hout, A., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Holtmaat, K., Jansen, F., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Hardillo, J. A., Baatenburg de Jong, R. J., Tiren-Verbeet, N. L., Sommeijer, D. W., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30675-8 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Maguire, R., Fox, P. A., McCann, L., Miaskowski, C. A., Kotronoulas, G., Miller, M., Furlong, E., Ream, E., Armes, J., Patiraki, E. I., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015016 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Dennett, A. M., Peiris, C. L., Shields, N., Prendergast, L. A., & Taylor, N. F. (2016) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2016.02.012 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Research-Tested Mobile Apps for Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review
Jongerius, C., Russo, S., Mazzocco, K., & Pravettoni, G. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/10930 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Boger, E. J., Ellis, J., Latter, S. M., Foster, C. L., Kennedy, A. P., Jones, F., Fenerty, V., Kellar, I., & Demain, S. H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130990 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
An architecture and protocol for smart continuous eHealth monitoring using 5G
Lloret, J., Parra, L., Taha, M., & Tomás, J. (2017) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2017.05.018 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Pask, S., Pinto, C., Bristowe, K., van Vliet, L., Nicholson, C. J., Evans, C., George, R., Bailey, K. P., Davies, J. M., Guo, P., et al. (2018) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216318757622 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Empowerment in cancer patients: Does peer support make a difference? A systematic review
Ziegler, E., Hill, J., Lieske, B., Klein, J., Knesebeck, O. V. D., & Kofahl, C. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5869 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Serum Detection of Nonadherence to Adjuvant Tamoxifen and Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk
Pistilli, B., Paci, A., Ferreira, A. R., Meglio, A. D., Poinsignon, V., Bardet, A., Menvielle, G., Dumas, A., Pinto, S., Dauchy, S., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.19.01758 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Distress is Interdependent in Patients and Caregivers with Newly Diagnosed Incurable Cancers
Jacobs, J. M., Shaffer, K. M., Nipp, R. D., Fishbein, J. N., MacDonald, J. J., El-Jawahri, A. R., Pirl, W. F., Jackson, V. A., Park, E. R., Temel, J. S., et al. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9875-3 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Cuthbert, C. A., Farragher, J. F., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Ding, Q., McKinnon, G. P., & Cheung, W. Y. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5215 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Posadzki, P., Mastellos, N., Ryan, R. E., Gunn, L. H., Felix, L. M., Pappas, Y., Gagnon, M., Julious, S. A., Xiang, L., Oldenburg, B. F., et al. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009921.pub2 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Empowerment of Cancer Survivors Through Information Technology: An Integrative Review
Groen, W. G., Kuijpers, W., Oldenburg, H. S., Wouters, M. W., Aaronson, N. K., & van Harten, W. H. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4818 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Palmer, N. R., Kent, E. E., Forsythe, L. P., Arora, N. K., Rowland, J. H., Aziz, N. M., Blanch‐Hartigan, D., Oakley-Girvan, I. A., Hamilton, A. S., & Weaver, K. E. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.55.5060 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Mayer, D. K., & Alfano, C. M. (2019) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djy232 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review
Boland, L., Bennett, K., & Connolly, D. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3999-7 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Lubberding, S., van Uden-Kraan, C. V., Velde, E. A. T., Cuijpers, P., Leemans, C., & Leeuw, I. V. V.-D. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12753 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Essential oncology nursing care along the cancer continuum
Young, A., Charalambous, A., Owen, R., Njodzeka, B. W., Oldenmenger, W. H., Alqudimat, M. R., & So, W. K. W. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30612-4 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Feasibility of an eHealth application “OncoKompas” to improve personalized survivorship cancer care
Duman-Lubberding, S., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Jansen, F., Witte, B. I., van der Velden, L. A., Lacko, M., Cuijpers, P., Leemans, C. R., & Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-015-3004-2 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Does patient activation level affect the cancer patient journey?
Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., & Sonet, E. M. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.019 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Alfano, C. M., Jefford, M., Maher, J., Birken, S. A., & Mayer, D. K. (2019) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk_238267 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Unmet social support needs among older adults with cancer
Williams, G. R., Pisu, M., Rocque, G. B., Williams, C., Taylor, R. A., Kvale, E. A., Partridge, E. E., Bhatia, S., & Kenzik, K. M. (2018) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31809 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Provision of integrated psychosocial services for cancer survivors post-treatment
Recklitis, C. J., & Syrjala, K. L. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30659-3 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Patient Education, Coaching, and Self-Management for Cancer Pain
Lovell, M. R., Luckett, T., Boyle, F. M., Phillips, J. L., Agar, M. R., & Davidson, P. M. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.52.4850 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research
Burke, S. M., Wurz, A. J., Bradshaw, A., Saunders, S., West, M. A., & Brunet, J. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9050053 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review
Davy, C. P., Bleasel, J. M., Liu, H., Tchan, M., Ponniah, S., & Brown, A. D. H. (2015) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0319-5 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Stanton, A. L., Petrie, K. J., & Partridge, A. H. (2014) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-014-2961-3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients’ symptoms: review of randomized trials
Fridriksdóttir, N., Gunnarsdóttir, S., Zoëga, S., Ingadóttir, B., & Hafsteinsdóttir, E. J. G. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3882-6 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Bailo, L., Guiddi, P., Vergani, L., Marton, G., & Pravettoni, G. (2019) · ecancermedicalscience · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2019.912 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self‐advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis
Thomas, T. H., & Donovan, H. S. (2013) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12084 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Mikolasek, M., Witt, C. M., & Barth, J. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/11271 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Kim, S., Kim, K., & Mayer, D. (2017) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/17.onf.719-728 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Jørgensen, C. H. R., Thomsen, T. G., Ross, L., Dietz, S. M., Therkildsen, S., Grøenvold, M., Rasmussen, C. L., & Johnsen, A. T. (2017) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732317721477 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Hou, I., Lin, H., Shen, S.-H., Chang, K., Tai, H., Tsai, A.-J., & Dykes, P. C. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/17084 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Kvale, E. A., Huang, C.-H. S., Meneses, K., Demark‐Wahnefried, W., Bae, S., Azuero, C. B., Rocque, G. B., Bevis, K. S., & Ritchie, C. S. (2016) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30136 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Pearce, G., Pinnock, H., Epiphaniou, E., Parke, H. L., Heavey, E., Griffiths, C., Greenhalgh, T., Sheikh, A., & Taylor, S. J. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141803 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Nursing’s Potential to Address the Growing Cancer Burden in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Challinor, J. M., Galassi, A. L., Al-Ruzzieh, M. A., Bigirimana, J. B., Buswell, L. A., So, W. K. W., Steinberg, A. B., & Williams, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/jgo.2015.001974 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Maunsell, E., Lauzier, S., Brunet, J., Pelletier, S., Osborne, R. H., & Campbell, H. S. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28847 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Keesing, S., McNamara, B. A., & Rosenwax, L. K. (2014) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-014-0407-x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Hecke, A. V., Heinen, M. M., Fernández‐Ortega, P., Graue, M., Hendriks, J., Høy, B., Köpke, S., Lithner, M., & van Gaal, B. G. I. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13159 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Wakefield, D., Bayly, J., Selman, L. E., Firth, A. M., Higginson, I. J., & Murtagh, F. E. (2018) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216318783919 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Forsythe, L. P., Alfano, C. M., Kent, E. E., Weaver, K. E., Bellizzi, K. M., Arora, N. K., Aziz, N. M., Keel, G., & Rowland, J. H. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3480 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Melissant, H. C., Leeuw, I. M. V., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., Konings, I. R. H. M., Cuijpers, P. J., & van Uden‐Kraan, C. F. (2018) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2018.1438654 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Hochstenbach, L. M. J., Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Courtens, A. M., van Kleef, M., & de Witte, L. (2016) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2016.03.009 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Smith, D., Harvey, P. W., Lawn, S., Harris, M., & Battersby, M. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1368-5 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Dubey, C., Maria, J. D., Hoeppli, C., Betticher, D. C., & Eicher, M. (2015) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.004 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Warrington, L., Absolom, K. L., & Velikova, G. (2015) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.3109/0284186x.2014.995778 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Ran, K. A., & Park, H. (2015) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-142 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Emergency department visits among people with cancer: Frequency, symptoms, and characteristics
Gallaway, M. S., Idaikkadar, N., Tai, E. W., Momin, B. R., Rohan, E. A., Townsend, J. S., Puckett, M., & Stewart, S. L. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open · doi:10.1002/emp2.12438 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Dijck, S. V., Nelissen, P., Verbelen, H., et al. (2016) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2016.04.010 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Chubak, J., Tuzzio, L., Hsu, C., Alfano, C. M., Rabin, B. A., Hornbrook, M. C., Spegman, A. M., Worley, A. V., Williams, A., & Nekhlyudov, L. (2012) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.2011.000312 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Kaal, S. E. J., Husson, O., van Duivenboden, S., Jansen, R., Manten‐Horst, E., Servaes, P., Prins, J. B., van den Berg, S. W., & van der Graaf, W. T. A. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30827 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Navigating cancer using online communities: a grounded theory of survivor and family experiences
Harkin, L., Beaver, K., Dey, P., & Choong, K. A. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0616-1 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Gaston‐Johansson, F., Fall‐Dickson, J. M., Nanda, J. P., Sarenmalm, E. K., Browall, M., & Goldstein, N. S. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3031 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 731: Group Prenatal Care
(2018) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002529 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Geng, Z., Ogbolu, Y., Wang, J., Hinds, P. S., Qian, H., & Yuan, C. (2018) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000571 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Kondylakis, H., Bucur, A., Dong, F., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1109/cbms.2017.62 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Mobile applications for breast cancer survivorship and self-management: A systematic review
Kapoor, A., Nambisan, P., & Baker, E. (2020) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458220950853 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Association between anxiety, depression, and comorbid chronic diseases among cancer survivors
Yan, R., Xia, J., Yang, R., Lv, B., Wu, P., Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Che, B., Wang, J., et al. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5078 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Moradian, S., Voelker, N., Brown, C., Liu, G., & Howell, D. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3900-8 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for colorectal cancer patients
Mosher, C. E., Winger, J. G., Given, B. A., Shahda, S., & Helft, P. R. (2017) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3693-9 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Lafaro, K. J., Raz, D. J., Kim, J. Y., Hite, S., Ruel, N., Varatkar, G., Erhunmwunsee, L., Melstrom, L., Lee, B., Singh, G., et al. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-05230-0 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Donovan, H. S., Ward, S. E., Sereika, S. M., Knapp, J. E., Sherwood, P. R., Bender, C. M., Edwards, R. P., Fields, M. M., & Ingel, R. (2013) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.04.005 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Elkefi, S., Trapani, D., & Ryan, S. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105065 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Budhwani, S., Wodchis, W. P., Zimmermann, C., Moineddin, R., & Howell, D. (2018) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001529 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Perceived Impact of Cancer Treatment on Diabetes Self-Management
Hershey, D. S., Tipton, J. M., Given, B. A., & Davis, E. (2012) · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care · doi:10.1177/0145721712458835 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Cancer patient-centered home care: a new model for health care in oncology
Gebbia, V., Gebbia, V., Borsellino, Ferraù, Verderame, Butera, Giuffrida, & Tralongo, P. (2011) · Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management · doi:10.2147/tcrm.s22119 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Jerofke, T., Weiss, M., & Yakusheva, O. (2014) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12286 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Cho, Y., Zhang, H., Harris, M. R., Gong, Y., Smith, E. L., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24638 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
A Conceptual Framework of Self-advocacy in Women With Cancer
Thomas, T. H., Donovan, H. S., Rosenzweig, M. Q., Bender, C. M., & Schenker, Y. (2020) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/ans.0000000000000342 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Ye, Z., Zhang, Z., Tang, Y. C., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2019.06.005 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Differences in coping strategies among young adults and the elderly with cancer
Hernández, R., Calderón, C., Carmona‐Bayonas, A., Capote, A. R., Jara, C., Alvarez, A., Gómez‐Camacho, M. D. L. N., Beato, C., Castelo, B., Majem, M., et al. (2019) · Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1111/psyg.12420 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
The Cancer Empowerment Questionnaire: Psychological Empowerment in Breast Cancer Survivors
van den Berg, S. W., van Amstel, F. K. P., Ottevanger, P. B., Gielissen, M. F. M., & Prins, J. B. (2013) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2013.825361 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Xi, Z., Gao, R., Lin, J. L., Chen, N., Lin, Q., Huang, G. F., Wang, L., Chen, X. H., Xue, F. Q., & Li, H. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15199 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
den Bakker, C. M., Schaafsma, F. G., Huirne, J. A. F., Consten, E. C. J., Stockmann, H. B. A. C., Rodenburg, C. J., de Klerk, G. J., Bonjer, H. J., & Anema, J. R. (2018) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-018-5105-z · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Patient empowerment: a systematic review of questionnaires measuring empowerment in cancer patients
Eskildsen, N. B., Jørgensen, C. H. R., Thomsen, T. G., Ross, L., Dietz, S. M., Grøenvold, M., & Johnsen, A. T. (2017) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2016.1267402 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Patient-Provider Communication: the Rise of Patient Engagement
Jenerette, C. M., & Mayer, D. K. (2016) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2016.02.007 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Peng, M., Ma, Z., & Ran, M. (2022) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-022-00794-9 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Atrial Fibrillation Health Literacy Information Technology System: Pilot Assessment
Magnani, J. W., Schlusser, C. L., Kimani, E., Rollman, B. L., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., & Bickmore, T. W. (2017) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/cardio.8543 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“We propose the relational agent as a vehicle for improving chronic disease self-management, which provides practical strategies to negotiate the long-term self-care and medication adherence that are essential for patient’s success with a chronic disease such as AF [8].”
Background
- Authors
- McCorkle, R., Ercolano, E., Lazenby, M., Schulman-Green, D., Schilling, L. S., Lorig, K., & Wagner, E. H.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Group Health Cooperative (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCorkle, Ruth
- Venue
- CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-62
- ISSN
- 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3058905
- OpenAlex
- W2113970081
- Semantic Scholar
- deab4e44ad96caf2a337cc1bae05befe8fbafd71
- Cited by
- 950
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR007778, R01NR011872, P30NR004000, P30NR008999)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- self-management, Chronic Care Model, patient empowerment, family caregivers, cancer survivorship, end-of-life care, cancer care continuum, self-management interventions, shared decision-making, care planning, patient-provider relationship
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Humans, Neoplasms, Self Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review