The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arsenic Methylation and Skin Cancer Risk in Southwestern Taiwan
Abstract
Learning Objectives Review the epidemiology and clinical consequences of arsenic exposure. Explain the relationships found in this case-control study among cumulative arsenic exposure, primary and secondary arsenic methylation, gender, and skin cancer. Understand how widely—if at all—the study findings may be generalized to populations other than the Taiwanese. Arsenic is a known carcinogen, but data are especially lacking on the health effects of low-level exposure, and on the health significance of methylation ability. We conducted a case-control study (76 cases and 224 controls from 1996 to 1999) in southwestern Taiwan to explore the association among primary and secondary arsenic methylation index (PMI and SMI, respectively), cumulative arsenic exposure (CAE), and the risk of skin cancer. As compared with the controls, the skin cancer group reported more sun exposure (P = 0.02) and had a lower BMI (P = 0.03), as well as lower education level (P = 0.01). Skin cancer patients and controls were similar with regard to age, gender, smoking and alcohol consumption. Given a low SMI (≤5), CAE > 15 mg/L-year was associated with an increased risk of skin cancer (OR, 7.48; 95% CI, 1.65–33.99) compared to a CAE ≤2 mg/L-year. Given the same level of PMI, SMI, and CAE, men had a higher risk of skin cancer (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.46–11.22) when compared to women. Subjects with low SMI and high CAE have a substantially increased risk of skin cancer. Males in all strata of arsenic exposure and methylation ability had a higher risk of skin cancer than women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Determination of arsenic species: A critical review of methods and applications, 2000–2003
Francesconi, K. A., & Kuehnelt, D. (2004) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b401321m · Cited by 469
Health Effects of Arsenic and Chromium in Drinking Water: Recent Human Findings
Smith, A. H., & Steinmaus, C. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100143 · Cited by 369
Kuo, C.-C., Moon, K. A., Wang, S.-L., Silbergeld, E., & Navas-Acien, A. (2017) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp577 · Cited by 312
Chen, Y., Parvez, F., Gamble, M., Islam, T., Ahmed, A., Argos, M., Graziano, J. H., & Ahsan, H. (2009) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.010 · Cited by 301
Self-citationA review on environmental factors regulating arsenic methylation in humans
Tseng, C.-H. (2009) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2008.12.016 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-C., Guo, Y.-L. L., Su, H.-J. J., Hsueh, Y.-M., Smith, T. J., Ryan, L. M., Lee, M.-S., Chao, S.-C., Lee, J. Y.-Y., & Christiani, D. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 241-248
- ISSN
- 1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106380683
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic Methylation and Skin Cancer Risk in Southwestern Taiwan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.jom.0000058336.05741.e8
- The paper
- Chen, Y.-C., Guo, Y.-L. L., Su, H.-J. J., Hsueh, Y.-M., Smith, T. J., Ryan, L. M., Lee, M.-S., Chao, S.-C., Lee, J. Y.-Y., & Christiani, D. C. (2003). Arsenic Methylation and Skin Cancer Risk in Southwestern Taiwan. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000058336.05741.e8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.