Cited by 188Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports injuries and preventionWinter Sports Injuries and Performance

Concussion Reporting Rates at the Conclusion of an Intercollegiate Athletic Career

Llewellyn, Tracy, Burdette, G. Trey, Joyner, A. Barry, Buckley, Thomas A.·2014·Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the current reported, unreported, and potentially unrecognized concussion rates among collegiate student-athletes who have completed their collegiate athletic career. DESIGN: Retrospective survey. SETTING: College and University athletic training rooms. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-one collegiate student-athletes (56.5% women; aged 21.5 ± 1.3; 3.7 ± 1.0 years of collegiate athletic experience) from 10 institutions who had either completed their intercollegiate athletic eligibility or were no longer participating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The self-reported concussion rate, the unreported rate and reasons, and the potentially unrecognized concussion rate. RESULTS: The self-reported concussion rate was 33.5% (54/161), and 22.2% (12) self-reported at least 3 concussions. The unreported rate was 11.8% (19/161), and the potentially unrecognized rate was 26.1% (42/161) with the most common unrecognized symptom being "knocked silly/seen stars" (23.6% [38/161]). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 49.7% of all respondents (80/161) reported 1 acknowledged, unreported, or potential concussion. The unreported rate was lower than previous high school studies; however, the potentially unrecognized rate remains high and should be clinically concerning. These findings suggest educational interventions targeting collegiate student-athletes should remain and continue to focus on identifying concussion symptoms and dispelling the common misconception that "bell ringers" and "dings" are not concussions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jsm.0000432853.77520.3d

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Llewellyn, T., Burdette, G. T., Joyner, A. B., & Buckley, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Valdosta State University (US)
  • Georgia Southern University (US)
Corresponding author
Llewellyn, Tracy
Venue
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Published
2014-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
76-79
ISSN
1050-642X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066332029
Cited by
188
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 8
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Keywords
concussion, collegiate student-athletes, concussion reporting, concussion symptoms, post-concussion symptoms, concussion education, college athletics
MeSH terms
Athletic Injuries, Brain Concussion, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, United States, Universities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review