Cited by 169Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric AcidNephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants

Effect of ascorbic acid consumption on urinary stone risk factors

TRAXER, OLIVIER, HUET, BEVERLEY, POINDEXTER, JOHN, PAK, CHARLES Y.C., PEARLE, MARGARET S.·2003·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ascorbic acid (AA) has been implicated as a risk factor for calcium oxalate stones due to its conversion to oxalate and potential acidifying properties. We evaluated the effect of AA consumption on urinary saturation of calcium oxalate (CaOx) and urinary pH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 normal subjects (NS) and 12 CaOx stone formers (SF) underwent 2, 6-day phases of study while maintained on a controlled metabolic diet. In each phase subjects ingested 1 gm AA or an identical appearing placebo twice daily. On the last 2 days of each phase 2, 24-hour urine collections were analyzed for pH and stone risk factors, and blood specimens were submitted for serum chemistry studies. RESULTS: No difference in urinary pH was found between placebo and AA phases in NS (6.02 versus 6.02) and SF (6.0 versus 6.0). However, urinary oxalate was statistically significantly higher in the AA versus placebo phase for NS (34.7 versus 28.5 mg, p = 0.008) and SF (41.0 versus 30.5 mg, p <0.001). Likewise, the CaOx relative saturation ratio was significantly higher in the AA versus placebo phase for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ingestion of 2 gm AA daily results in no change in urinary pH but a moderate though statistically significant increase in urinary oxalate in NS (20%) and SF (33%). Stone formers respond no differently to AA than normal subjects. We recommend limiting AA use to less than 2 gm daily in CaOx stone formers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000076001.21606.53

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TRAXER, O., HUET, B., POINDEXTER, J., PAK, C. Y. C., & PEARLE, M. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2003-08
Volume
170
Issue
2
Pages
397-401
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2117259881
Cited by
169
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
vitamin C, calcium oxalate stones, urinary oxalate, urine pH, stone formers, urinary stone risk factors, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Adult, Ascorbic Acid, Calcium Oxalate, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Risk Factors, Urinary Calculi, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review