The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Preoperative Nomogram Identifying Decreased Risk of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: We developed a preoperative nomogram for prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective, nonrandomized analysis of 7,014 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at 6 institutions between 1985 and 2000. Exclusion criteria consisted of preoperative androgen ablation therapy, salvage radical prostatectomy and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 50 ng/ml. Preoperative predictors of lymph node metastases consisted of pretreatment PSA, clinical stage (1992 TNM) and biopsy Gleason sum. These predictors were used in logistic regression analysis based nomograms to predict the probability of lymph node metastases. RESULTS: Overall 5,510 patients with complete clinical and pathological information were included in the study. Lymph nodes metastases were present in 206 patients (3.7%). Pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage and institution represented predictors of lymph node status (p <0.001). Bootstrap corrected predictive accuracy of the 3-variable nomogram (clinical stage, Gleason sum and PSA) was 0.76. Inclusion of a fourth variable, which accounts for institutional differences in lymph node metastases, yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.78. The negative predictive value of our nomograms was 0.99 when they predicted 3% or less chance of positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Using clinical information, we produced 2 calibrated and validated nomograms, which accurately predict pathologically negative lymph nodes in men with localized prostate cancer who are candidates for radical prostatectomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Mohler, J. L., Antonarakis, E. S., Armstrong, A. J., D’Amico, A. V., Davis, B. J., Dorff, T., Eastham, J. A., Enke, C. A., Farrington, T. A., Higano, C. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023 · Cited by 1,532
Self-citationvan Manen, L., Handgraaf, H. J. M., Diana, M., Dijkstra, J., Ishizawa, T., Vahrmeijer, A. L., & Mieog, J. S. D. (2018) · Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/jso.25105 · Cited by 322
From past to future: Bibliometric analysis of global research productivity on nomogram (2000–2021)
Wang, X., Lu, J., Song, Z., Zhou, Y., Liu, T., & Zhang, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.997713 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- CAGIANNOS, I., KARAKIEWICZ, P., EASTHAM, J. A., OHORI, M., RABBANI, F., GERIGK, C., REUTER, V., GRAEFEN, M., HAMMERER, P. G., ERBERSDOBLER, A., HULAND, H., KUPELIAN, P., KLEIN, E., QUINN, D. I., HENSHALL, S. M., GRYGIEL, J. J., SUTHERLAND, R. L., STRICKER, P. D., MORASH, C. G., SCARDINO, P. T., & KATTAN, M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1798-1803
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2004625759
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Preoperative Nomogram Identifying Decreased Risk of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000091805.98960.13
- The paper
- CAGIANNOS, I., KARAKIEWICZ, P., EASTHAM, J. A., OHORI, M., RABBANI, F., GERIGK, C., REUTER, V., GRAEFEN, M., HAMMERER, P. G., ERBERSDOBLER, A., HULAND, H., KUPELIAN, P., KLEIN, E., QUINN, D. I., HENSHALL, S. M., GRYGIEL, J. J., SUTHERLAND, R. L., STRICKER, P. D., MORASH, C. G., . . . KATTAN, M. W. (2003). A Preoperative Nomogram Identifying Decreased Risk of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000091805.98960.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.