The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organ Conservation in Invasive Bladder Cancer by Transurethral Resection, Chemotherapy and Radiation: Results of a Urodynamic and Quality of Life Study on Long-term Survivors
Abstract
PURPOSE: Transurethral resection, chemotherapy and radiation with salvage cystectomy may be used as alternatives to immediate radical cystectomy in the management of invasive bladder cancer. Concern exists about the function of the retained bladder after such therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 221 patients with clinical T2-4a bladder cancer treated at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1986 to 2000 with trimodality therapy, 71 were alive with native bladders and disease-free in 2001. These patients were asked to undergo a urodynamic study and to complete a quality of life questionnaire. A total of 69% participated in some component of this study with a median time from trimodality therapy of 6.3 years (range 1.6 to 14.9). RESULTS: Of 32 patients 24 had normally functioning bladders by urodynamic study. Decreased bladder compliance was seen in 7. Bladder hypersensitivity, involuntary detrusor contractions and incontinence were present in 2 women. The questionnaire showed that flow symptoms occurred in 6%, urgency in 15% and control problems in 19%. Of all women 11% wore pads. Distress from urinary symptoms was half as common as prevalence. Bowel symptoms occurred in 22% with 14% recording any level of distress. The majority of men retained sexual function. Global health related quality of life was high. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients treated with trimodality therapy retain good bladder function. A fifth have evidence of bowel dysfunction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rachel Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004 · Cited by 4,458
Cited by
Dyrskjøt, L., Hansel, D. E., Efstathiou, J. A., Knowles, M. A., Galsky, M. D., Teoh, J., & Theodorescu, D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00468-9 · Cited by 544
Efstathiou, J. A., Spiegel, D. Y., Shipley, W. U., Heney, N. M., Kaufman, D. S., Niemierko, A., Coen, J. J., Skowronski, R. Y., Paly, J. J., McGovern, F. J., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.010 · Cited by 435
Self-citationSadovsky, R., Basson, R., Krychman, M., Morales, A. M., Schover, L., Wang, R., & Incrocci, L. (2010) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01620.x · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- ZIETMAN, A. L., SACCO, D., SKOWRONSKI, U., GOMERY, P., KAUFMAN, D. S., CLARK, J. A., TALCOTT, J. A., & SHIPLEY, W. U.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1772-1776
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2157020021
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organ Conservation in Invasive Bladder Cancer by Transurethral Resection, Chemotherapy and Radiation: Results of a Urodynamic and Quality of Life Study on Long-term Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000093721.23249.c3
- The paper
- ZIETMAN, A. L., SACCO, D., SKOWRONSKI, U., GOMERY, P., KAUFMAN, D. S., CLARK, J. A., TALCOTT, J. A., & SHIPLEY, W. U. (2003). Organ Conservation in Invasive Bladder Cancer by Transurethral Resection, Chemotherapy and Radiation: Results of a Urodynamic and Quality of Life Study on Long-term Survivors. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000093721.23249.c3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.