The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Solid Renal Tumors: An Analysis of Pathological Features Related to Tumor Size
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined the relationship between tumor size and malignancy among solid renal tumors, and the relationship between tumor size and RCC subtype within tumors with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 2,770 adult patients who underwent radical nephrectomy or nephron sparing surgery for sporadic unilateral nonmetastatic solid renal tumors between 1970 and 2000. All pathology specimens were reviewed by a urological pathologist for diagnosis, and in RCC tumors, for histological subtype and nuclear grade. RESULTS: There were 376 benign (12.8%) and 2,559 (87.2%) malignant tumors. The percentage of benign tumors decreased from 46.3% for those less than 1 cm to 6.3% for those 7 cm or greater. Among RCC tumors the percentage that were clear cell increased from 25.6% for those less than 1 cm to 83.0% for tumors 7 cm or greater, while the percentage that were papillary decreased from 74.4% for those less than 1 cm to 10.0% for tumors 7 cm or greater. No RCC tumors less than 1 cm were chromophobe compared to 7.0% of tumors 7 cm or greater. The percentage of malignant tumors that were high grade RCC increased from 2.3% for those less than 1 cm to 57.7% for RCC tumors 7 cm or greater. Only 1% of all tumors less than 1 cm and 9.2% of all tumors less than 2 cm were high grade malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: As tumor size increased there was a significant increase in the odds of having a malignant compared to a benign tumor, clear cell compared to papillary RCC and high grade compared to low grade malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gill, I. S., Aron, M., Gervais, D. A., & Jewett, M. A. S. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp0910041 · Cited by 406
Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Finelli, A., Ismaila, N., Bro, B., Durack, J., Eggener, S., Evans, A., Gill, I., Graham, D., Huang, W., Jewett, M. A. S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.69.9645 · Cited by 367
Coy, H., Hsieh, K., Wu, W., Nagarajan, M. B., Young, J. R., Douek, M. L., Brown, M. S., Scalzo, F., & Raman, S. S. (2019) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-019-01929-0 · Cited by 110
Image-guided adrenal and renal biopsy
Sharma, K. V., Venkatesan, A. M., Swerdlow, D., DaSilva, D., Beck, A., Jain, N., & Wood, B. J. (2010) · Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology · doi:10.1053/j.tvir.2010.02.005 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- FRANK, I., BLUTE, M. L., CHEVILLE, J. C., LOHSE, C. M., WEAVER, A. L., & ZINCKE, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2217-2220
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2094159831
- Cited by
- 1,080
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solid Renal Tumors: An Analysis of Pathological Features Related to Tumor Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000095475.12515.5e
- The paper
- FRANK, I., BLUTE, M. L., CHEVILLE, J. C., LOHSE, C. M., WEAVER, A. L., & ZINCKE, H. (2003). Solid Renal Tumors: An Analysis of Pathological Features Related to Tumor Size. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000095475.12515.5e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.