Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

Finelli, Antonio, Ismaila, Nofisat, Bro, Bill, Durack, Jeremy, Eggener, Scott, Evans, Andrew, Gill, Inderbir, Graham, David, Huang, William, Jewett, Michael A.S., Latcha, Sheron, Lowrance, William, Rosner, Mitchell, Shayegan, Bobby, Thompson, R. Houston, Uzzo, Robert, Russo, Paul·2017·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To provide recommendations for the management options for patients with small renal masses (SRMs). Methods: By using a literature search and prospectively defined study selection, we sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, prospective comparative observational studies, and retrospective studies published from 2000 through 2015. Outcomes included recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Results: Eighty-three studies, including 20 systematic reviews and 63 primary studies, met the eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. Recommendations: On the basis of tumor-specific findings and competing risks of mortality, all patients with an SRM should be considered for a biopsy when the results may alter management. Active surveillance should be an initial management option for patients who have significant comorbidities and limited life expectancy. Partial nephrectomy (PN) for SRMs is the standard treatment that should be offered to all patients for whom an intervention is indicated and who possess a tumor that is amenable to this approach. Percutaneous thermal ablation should be considered an option if complete ablation can reliably be achieved. Radical nephrectomy for SRMs should only be reserved for patients who possess a tumor of significant complexity that is not amenable to PN or for whom PN may result in unacceptable morbidity even when performed at centers with expertise. Referral to a nephrologist should be considered if chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2) or progressive chronic kidney disease occurs after treatment, especially if associated with proteinuria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2016.69.9645

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Finelli, A., Ismaila, N., Bro, B., Durack, J., Eggener, S., Evans, A., Gill, I., Graham, D., Huang, W., Jewett, M. A. S., Latcha, S., Lowrance, W., Rosner, M., Shayegan, B., Thompson, R. H., Uzzo, R., & Russo, P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2017-02-20
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
668-680
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2572922053
Cited by
367
References
72
FWCI
31.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2016.69.9645
The paper
Finelli, A., Ismaila, N., Bro, B., Durack, J., Eggener, S., Evans, A., Gill, I., Graham, D., Huang, W., Jewett, M. A. S., Latcha, S., Lowrance, W., Rosner, M., Shayegan, B., Thompson, R. H., Uzzo, R., & Russo, P. (2017). Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.69.9645

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.