The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTS
Abstract
PURPOSE: We updated a long-term cancer control outcome in a large anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) series. We also evaluated the perioperative parameters that predict cancer specific outcomes following surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1983 to February 2003, 1 surgeon (WJC) performed RRP in 3,478 consecutive men. Patients were followed with semiannual serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests and annual digital rectal examinations. We used Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates to calculate actuarial 10-year probabilities of biochemical progression-free survival, cancer specific survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine independent perioperative predictors of cancer progression. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 65 months (range 0 to 233) actuarial 10-year biochemical progression-free, cancer specific and overall survival probabilities were 68%, 97% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis biochemical progression-free survival probability was significantly associated with preoperative PSA, clinical tumor stage, Gleason sum, pathological stage and treatment era. Cancer specific survival and overall survival rates were also significantly associated with clinicopathological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: RRP can be performed with excellent survival outcomes. Favorable clinicopathological parameters and treatment in the PSA era are associated with improved cancer control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antonarakis, E. S., Feng, Z., Trock, B. J., Humphreys, E. B., Carducci, M. A., Partin, A. W., Walsh, P. C., & Eisenberger, M. A. (2012) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10422.x · Cited by 276
Integrative epigenetic taxonomy of primary prostate cancer
Stelloo, S., Nevedomskaya, E., Kim, Y., Schuurman, K., Valle-Encinas, E., Lobo, J., Krijgsman, O., Peeper, D. S., Chang, S. L., Feng, F. Y.-C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07270-2 · Cited by 154
MATTHEW, A. G., GOLDMAN, A., TRACHTENBERG, J., ROBINSON, J., HORSBURGH, S., CURRIE, K., & RITVO, P. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000181206.16447.e2 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- ROEHL, K. A., HAN, M., RAMOS, C. G., ANTENOR, J. A. V., & CATALONA, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 910-914
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2104870101
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb
- The paper
- ROEHL, K. A., HAN, M., RAMOS, C. G., ANTENOR, J. A. V., & CATALONA, W. J. (2004). CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.