The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate‐specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long‐term follow‐up
Open accessAbstract
Study Type – Prognosis (cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy often develop subsequent metastases. However, the natural history of metastatic progression in men who have not received subsequent therapies before developing metastases has been understudied. Here, we describe the largest known cohort of men with PSA‐recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy who have not received additional treatments before metastasis. We characterize metastatic risk based on clinical variables, and we show that Gleason score and PSA doubling time are the strongest predictors of metastasis‐free survival. We present tables stratifying metastatic risk by these two variables. OBJECTIVE: To describe metastasis‐free survival (MFS) in men with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) recurrence following radical prostatectomy, and to define clinical prognostic factors modifying metastatic risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 450 men treated with prostatectomy at a tertiary hospital between July 1981 and July 2010 who developed PSA recurrence (≥0.2 ng/mL) and never received adjuvant or salvage therapy before the development of metastatic disease. We estimated MFS using the Kaplan–Meier method, and investigated factors influencing the risk of metastasis using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Median follow‐up after prostatectomy was 8.0 years, and after biochemical recurrence was 4.0 years. At last follow‐up, 134 of 450 patients (29.8%) had developed metastases, while median MFS was 10.0 years. Using multivariable regressions, two variables emerged as independently predictive of MFS: PSA doubling time (<3.0 vs 3.0–8.9 vs 9.0–14.9 vs ≥15.0 months) and Gleason score (≤6 vs 7 vs 8–10). Using these stratifications of Gleason score and PSA doubling time, tables were constructed to predict median, 5‐ and 10‐year MFS after PSA recurrence. In different patient subsets, median MFS ranged from 1 to 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: In men undergoing prostatectomy, MFS after PSA recurrence is variable and is most strongly influenced by PSA doubling time and Gleason score. These parameters serve to stratify men into different risk groups with respect to metastatic progression. Our findings may provide the background for appropriate selection of patients, treatments and endpoints for clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20073 · Cited by 12,596
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,877
Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical Prostatectomy
Pound, C. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.17.1591 · Cited by 3,071
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data
Young, W. R. (1981) · Journal of Quality Technology · doi:10.1080/00224065.1981.11978770 · Cited by 1,666
A Controlled Trial of Leuprolide with and without Flutamide in Prostatic Carcinoma
Crawford, E. D., Eisenberger, M. A., McLeod, D. G., Spaulding, J. T., Benson, R., Dorr, F. A., Blumenstein, B. A., Davis, M. A., & Goodman, P. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198908173210702 · Cited by 1,464
Self-citationMessing, E. M., Manola, J., Yao, J., Kiernan, M., Crawford, D., Wilding, G., di'SantAgnese, P. A., & Trump, D. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70700-8 · Cited by 893
ROEHL, K. A., HAN, M., RAMOS, C. G., ANTENOR, J. A. V., & CATALONA, W. J. (2004) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000134888.22332.bb · Cited by 861
Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer.
Eisenberger, M. A., Blumenstein, B. A., Crawford, E. D., Miller, G., McLeod, D. G., Loehrer, P. J., Wilding, G., Sears, K., Culkin, D. J., Thompson, I. M., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199810083391504 · Cited by 859
Self-citationTrock, B. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.23.2760 · Cited by 657
Self-citationLoblaw, D. A., Virgo, K. S., Nam, R., Somerfield, M. R., Ben-Josef, E., Mendelson, D. S., Middleton, R., Sharp, S. A., Smith, T. J., Talcott, J., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.10.1949 · Cited by 555
Cited by
Van den Broeck, T., van den Bergh, R. C. N., Arfi, N., Gross, T., Moris, L., Briers, E., Cumberbatch, M., De Santis, M., Tilki, D., Fanti, S., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.011 · Cited by 523
Carrie, C., Hasbini, A., de Laroche, G., Richaud, P., Guerif, S., Latorzeff, I., Supiot, S., Bosset, M., Lagrange, J.-L., Beckendorf, V., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00111-x · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Antonarakis, E. S., Feng, Z., Trock, B. J., Humphreys, E. B., Carducci, M. A., Partin, A. W., Walsh, P. C., & Eisenberger, M. A.
- Venue
- BJU International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07-20
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-39
- ISSN
- 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-410X
- OpenAlex
- W1506304343
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 15.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate‐specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long‐term follow‐up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10422.x
- The paper
- Antonarakis, E. S., Feng, Z., Trock, B. J., Humphreys, E. B., Carducci, M. A., Partin, A. W., Walsh, P. C., & Eisenberger, M. A. (2012). The natural history of metastatic progression in men with prostate‐specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: long‐term follow‐up. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10422.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.