Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM PREDICTING RECURRENCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CONVENTIONAL CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

SORBELLINI, MAXIMILIANO, KATTAN, MICHAEL W., SNYDER, MARK E., REUTER, VICTOR, MOTZER, ROBERT, GOETZL, MANLIO, McKIERNAN, JAMES, RUSSO, PAUL·2005·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few published studies have simultaneously analyzed multiple prognostic factors to predict recurrence after surgery for conventional clear cell renal cortical carcinomas. We developed and performed external validation of a postoperative nomogram for this purpose. We used a prospectively updated database of more than 1,400 patients treated at a single institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1989 to August 2002, 833 nephrectomies (partial and radical) for renal cell carcinoma of conventional clear cell histology performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were reviewed from the center's kidney database. Patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease or familial syndromes, as well as patients presenting with synchronous bilateral renal masses, or distant metastases or metastatic regional lymph nodes before or at surgery were excluded from study. We modeled clinicopathological data and disease followup for 701 patients with conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic variables for the nomogram included pathological stage, Fuhrman grade, tumor size, necrosis, vascular invasion and clinical presentation (ie incidental asymptomatic, locally symptomatic or systemically symptomatic). RESULTS: Disease recurrence was noted in 72 of 701 patients. Those patients without evidence of disease had a median and maximum followup of 32 and 120 months, respectively. The 5-year probability of freedom from recurrence for the patient cohort was 80.9% (95% confidence interval 75.7% to 85.1%). A nomogram was designed based on a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Following external validation predictions by the nomogram appeared accurate and discriminating, and the concordance index was 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram has been developed that can be used to predict the 5-year probability of freedom from recurrence for patients with conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma. This nomogram may be useful for patient counseling, clinical trial design and effective patient followup strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000148261.19532.2c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
SORBELLINI, M., KATTAN, M. W., SNYDER, M. E., REUTER, V., MOTZER, R., GOETZL, M., McKIERNAN, J., & RUSSO, P.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2005-01
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
48-51
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2121827874
Cited by
528
References
0
FWCI
29.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM PREDICTING RECURRENCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CONVENTIONAL CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000148261.19532.2c
The paper
SORBELLINI, M., KATTAN, M. W., SNYDER, M. E., REUTER, V., MOTZER, R., GOETZL, M., McKIERNAN, J., & RUSSO, P. (2005). A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM PREDICTING RECURRENCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CONVENTIONAL CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000148261.19532.2c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.