The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Follow-up for Clinically Localized Renal Neoplasms: AUA Guideline
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide a clinical framework for follow-up of clinically localized renal neoplasms undergoing active surveillance, or following definitive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review identified published articles in the English literature between January 1999 and 2011 relevant to key questions specified by the Panel related to kidney neoplasms and their follow-up (imaging, renal function, markers, biopsy, prognosis). Study designs consisting of clinical trials (randomized or not), observational studies (cohort, case-control, case series) and systematic reviews were included. RESULTS: Guideline statements provided guidance for ongoing evaluation of renal function, usefulness of renal biopsy, timing/type of radiographic imaging and formulation of future research initiatives. A lack of studies precluded risk stratification beyond tumor staging; therefore, for the purposes of postoperative surveillance guidelines, patients with localized renal cancers were grouped into strata of low- and moderate- to high-risk for disease recurrence based on pathological tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation for patients on active surveillance and following definitive therapy for renal neoplasms should include physical examination, renal function, serum studies and imaging and should be tailored according to recurrence risk, comorbidities and monitoring for treatment sequelae. Expert opinion determined a judicious course of monitoring/surveillance that may change in intensity as surgical/ablative therapies evolve, renal biopsy accuracy improves and more long-term follow-up data are collected. The beneficial impact of careful follow-up will also need critical evaluation as further study is completed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization
Go, A. S., Chertow, G. M., Fan, D., McCulloch, C. E., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041031 · Cited by 11,369
Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation:: BEIR VII Phase 2
Earth, D. O. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,190
Guideline for Management of the Clinical T1 Renal Mass
Campbell, S. C., Novick, A. C., Belldegrun, A., Blute, M. L., Chow, G. K., Derweesh, I. H., Faraday, M. M., Kaouk, J. H., Leveillee, R. J., Matin, S. F., et al. (2009) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citationHuang, W. C., Levey, A. S., Serio, A. M., Snyder, M., Vickers, A. J., Raj, G. V., Scardino, P. T., & Russo, P. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70803-8 · Cited by 1,613
Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria
Goldberg, S. N., Grassi, C. J., Cardella, J. F., Charboneau, J. W., Dodd, G. D., Dupuy, D. E., Gervais, D., Gillams, A. R., Kane, R. A., Lee, F. T., et al. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2353042205 · Cited by 1,193
FRANK, I., BLUTE, M. L., CHEVILLE, J. C., LOHSE, C. M., WEAVER, A. L., & ZINCKE, H. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64153-5 · Cited by 1,175
American College of Radiology White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine
Amis, E. S., Butler, P. F., Applegate, K. E., Birnbaum, S. B., Brateman, L. F., Hevezi, J. M., Mettler, F. A., Morin, R. L., Pentecost, M. J., Smith, G. G., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.03.002 · Cited by 902
Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System
Zisman, A., Pantuck, A. J., Dorey, F., Said, J. W., Shvarts, O., Quintana, D., Gitlitz, B. J., deKernion, J. B., Figlin, R. A., & Belldegrun, A. S. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1649 · Cited by 729
SORBELLINI, M., KATTAN, M. W., SNYDER, M. E., REUTER, V., MOTZER, R., GOETZL, M., McKIERNAN, J., & RUSSO, P. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000148261.19532.2c · Cited by 528
Self-citationMotzer, R. J., Bacik, J., Mariani, T., Russo, P., Mazumdar, M., & Reuter, V. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.11.123 · Cited by 496
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Donat, S. M., Diaz, M., Bishoff, J. T., Coleman, J. A., Dahm, P., Derweesh, I. H., Herrell, S. D., Hilton, S., Jonasch, E., Lin, D. W., Reuter, V. E., & Chang, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 190
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 407-416
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2141571201
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 24.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follow-up for Clinically Localized Renal Neoplasms: AUA Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.121
- The paper
- Donat, S. M., Diaz, M., Bishoff, J. T., Coleman, J. A., Dahm, P., Derweesh, I. H., Herrell, S. D., Hilton, S., Jonasch, E., Lin, D. W., Reuter, V. E., & Chang, S. S. (2013). Follow-up for Clinically Localized Renal Neoplasms: AUA Guideline. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.