Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

5-YEAR URINARY AND SEXUAL OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE PROSTATE CANCER OUTCOMES STUDY

PENSON, DAVID F., McLERRAN, DALE, FENG, ZIDING, LI, LIN, ALBERTSEN, PETER C., GILLILAND, FRANK D., HAMILTON, ANN, HOFFMAN, RICHARD M., STEPHENSON, ROBERT A., POTOSKY, ARNOLD L., STANFORD, JANET L.·2005·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prior studies of postoperative outcomes following radical prostatectomy have been limited by selection bias and short-term followup. In this study we assessed temporal changes in urinary and sexual function up to 5 years following radical prostatectomy in a population based cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 1,288 men with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and completed a baseline survey within 6 to 12 months of diagnosis were included in the analysis. Two and 5-year functional and quality of life data were collected, as was information on the use of erectile aids. Temporal functional changes and potentially confounding or modifying factors were assessed using longitudinal regression models. RESULTS: Of these men 14% reported frequent urinary leakage or no urinary control 60 months after diagnosis, which was slightly higher than the 10% reporting incontinence at 24 months (p = 0.007). At 60 months 28% of the men had erections firm enough for intercourse compared with 22% at 24 months (p = 0.003). Sildenafil was the most commonly used erectile aid (43% ever used) and 45% of users reported that it helped "somewhat" or "a lot." CONCLUSIONS: Urinary and sexual dysfunction were common 5 years following radical prostatectomy in this large, community based cohort of prostate cancer survivors. While a small minority of subjects experienced changes in urinary or sexual function between years 2 and 5 after prostatectomy, functional outcomes remained relatively stable in the majority of participants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
PENSON, D. F., McLERRAN, D., FENG, Z., LI, L., ALBERTSEN, P. C., GILLILAND, F. D., HAMILTON, A., HOFFMAN, R. M., STEPHENSON, R. A., POTOSKY, A. L., & STANFORD, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2005-05
Volume
173
Issue
5
Pages
1701-1705
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2167323189
Cited by
559
References
1
FWCI
24.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 5-YEAR URINARY AND SEXUAL OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE PROSTATE CANCER OUTCOMES STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a
The paper
PENSON, D. F., McLERRAN, D., FENG, Z., LI, L., ALBERTSEN, P. C., GILLILAND, F. D., HAMILTON, A., HOFFMAN, R. M., STEPHENSON, R. A., POTOSKY, A. L., & STANFORD, J. L. (2005). 5-YEAR URINARY AND SEXUAL OUTCOMES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE PROSTATE CANCER OUTCOMES STUDY. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.