Cited by 193Sexual function and dysfunction studiesCancer survivorship and careSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment

Open access
Schover, Leslie R., Canada, Andrea L., Yuan, Ying, Sui, Dawen, Neese, Leah, Jenkins, Rosell, Rhodes, Michelle M.·2012·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After treatment for prostate cancer, multidisciplinary sexual rehabilitation involving couples appears more promising than traditional urologic treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). The authors of this report conducted a randomized trial comparing traditional or internet-based sexual counseling with waitlist (WL) control. METHODS: Couples were randomized adaptively to a 3-month WL, a 3-session face-to-face format (FF), or an internet-based format (WEB1). A second internet-based group (WEB2) was added to examine the relation between web site use and outcomes. At baseline, post-WL, post-treatment, and 6-month, and 12-month follow-up assessments, participants completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 to measure emotional distress, and the abbreviated Dyadic Adjustment Scale. RESULTS: Outcomes did not change during the WL period. Of 115 couples that were randomized to FF or WEB1 and 71 couples in the WEB2 group, 34% dropped out. Neither drop-outs nor improvements in outcomes differed significantly between the 3 treatment groups. In a linear mixed-model analysis that included all participants, mean ± standard deviation IIEF scores improved significantly across time (baseline, 29.7 ± 17.9; 12 months, 36.2 ± 22.4; P < .001). FSFI scores also improved significantly (baseline, 15.4 ± 8.5; 12 months, 18.2 ± 10.7; P = .034). Better IIEF scores were associated with finding an effective medical treatment for ED and normal female sexual function at baseline. In the WEB2 group, IIEF scores improved significantly more in men who completed >75% of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: An internet-based sexual counseling program for couples was as effective as a brief, traditional sex therapy format in producing enduring improvements in sexual outcomes after prostate cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.26308

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schover, L. R., Canada, A. L., Yuan, Y., Sui, D., Neese, L., Jenkins, R., & Rhodes, M. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Prairie View A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Schover, Leslie R.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-26
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
500-509
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1544685649
Cited by
193
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
prostate cancer, erectile dysfunction, sexual rehabilitation, couples, online counseling, sex therapy, female sexual function, dyadic adjustment, emotional distress, medication adherence, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Sex Counseling, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Couples Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review