Cited by 104Renal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenal and Vascular Pathologies

Renal injury in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice

Open access
Wen, Min, Segerer, Stephan, Dantas, Marcio, Brown, Paul A, Hudkins, Kelly L, Goodpaster, Tracy, Kirk, Elizabeth, LeBoeuf, Renée C +1 more·2002·Laboratory Investigation

Abstract

Hyperlipidemia is thought to accelerate the progression of renal diseases, but the mechanisms by which hyperlipidemia exerts its deleterious effect is still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to describe the renal pathology in a hyperlipidemic mouse strain, the apolipoprotein E-deficient mice (apoE-/-). Renal specimens from a total of 34 mice were studied, including 19 apoE-/- females at the age of 36 weeks, 9 apoE-/- females at the age of 24 weeks, and 6 wild-type females (C57BL/6) as controls. Kidneys were evaluated by histologic examination, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect MAC-2-expressing monocyte/macrophages, and the proliferation marker PCNA. Glomerular cell number, glomerular matrix area, and glomerular area were quantified by morphometry. Glomerular lesions in apoE-/- mice were characterized by macrophage accumulation, commonly with foam cell appearance, deposition of extracellular matrix, glomerular hyperplasia, and at times prominent mesangiolysis associated with capillary microaneurysms. Some cases demonstrated lipid deposits filling glomerular capillaries. Arterioles of the vascular pole demonstrated a "foamy" degeneration of smooth muscle cells. These lesions related to hyperlipidemia in this well-established mouse strain have not been previously described. Because this mouse strain is among the most widely studied for interventions aimed at altering hyperlipidemia and the progression of atherosclerosis, we believe that our observations may be of major importance for the accurate interpretation of interventional studies in this strain and offer a new opportunity to study mechanisms of hyperlipidemic renal injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.lab.0000022222.03120.d4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • apoE-/- and DKO mice have been reported to develop renal abnormalities that are different from those found in LPG.

    “apoE Ϫ / Ϫ and DKO mice have been reported to develop renal abnormalities that are different from those found in LPG (40)(41)(42).”

    From Macrophage-derived apoESendai suppresses atherosclerosis while causing lipoprotein glomerulopathy in hyperlipidemic mice (2014) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Abstract reports renal injury in apoE-deficient mice and cites a study of renal injury in double-knockout mice. But the Discussion says that a lesion in the apoE-deficient mice resembles the lipoprotein thrombi of LPG, so this paper does not support a blanket claim that their renal abnormalities differ from those in LPG. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, M., Segerer, S., Dantas, M., Brown, P. A., Hudkins, K. L., Goodpaster, T., Kirk, E., LeBoeuf, R. C., & Alpers, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Alpers, Charles E
Venue
Laboratory Investigation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
82
Issue
8
Pages
999-1006
ISSN
0023-6837 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113916200
Cited by
104
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Laboratory Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
  • National Institutes of Health (DK47659)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL52848, R01HL052848)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK47659, P50DK047659)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
ApoE-deficient mice, hyperlipidemia, kidney injury, glomerular lesions, macrophage accumulation, foam cells, extracellular matrix deposition, glomerular hyperplasia, mesangiolysis, lipid deposits, glomerular morphometry, galectin-3
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Differentiation, Apolipoproteins E, Hyperlipidemias, Immunohistochemistry, Kidney, Kidney Glomerulus, Mice, Knockout, Galectin 3, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review