Cited by 88Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesHead and Neck Surgical Oncology

Auricular Cartilage Grafts And Nasal Surgery

Murrell, George L.·2004·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objective: To illustrate the safety, effectiveness, and versatility of auricular cartilage grafts in nasal surgery. Study Design: Retrospective chart review of the author's nasal surgery experience for an 8‐year period. Methods: Five hundred eight rhinoplasties were performed over an 8‐year period. One hundred one of these cases used auricular cartilage grafts as donor material. Results: Donor cartilage was used in a wide range of grafting techniques: tip grafts, dorsal onlays, spreader grafts, septal replacements, alar battens, composite grafts, etc. The average follow up was 12 months. The complication rate was low. Five patients experienced complications involving the auricular cartilage graft or its donor site. No patients experienced graft resorption or infection. Donor site morbidity was limited. No auricular infections or hematomas were observed. Conclusion: Septal cartilage is usually the first choice as donor material in nasal surgery; however, when indicated, auricular cartilage grafts can serve as a safe, effective, and versatile alternative. This conclusion is supported by their successful use in a wide variety of surgical techniques, with long‐term follow‐up. The author feels strongly that autografts should be favored over alloplastic material. Alloplastic grafts continue to present a risk of infection over the entire life of their use. When a rhinoplasty is performed skillfully with a cartilage autograft, time becomes an ally of the surgeon rather than an enemy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149440.20608.7c

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murrell, G. L.
Affiliations
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Murrell, George L.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
114
Issue
12
Pages
2092-2102
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W1983402353
Cited by
88
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
Keywords
auricular cartilage graft, rhinoplasty, nasal surgery, autograft, septal cartilage, spreader grafts, graft resorption, donor site morbidity, alloplastic grafts, postoperative complications
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear Cartilage, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Nose Deformities, Acquired, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Transplantation, Autologous, Wound Healing, Tissue Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review