Cord blood lipoproteins and prenatal influences
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Blood lipoprotein profiles in early life are known to be related to and predictive of those in adulthood, but little is known about their determinants. Genetic and environmental influences affect cord blood lipoproteins, but how this occurs and the relative contribution of these influences to the overall profile in healthy newborns remains uncertain. RECENT FINDINGS: This review discusses findings from a range of earlier and more recent studies, and summarizes the key influences on cord blood lipoproteins. In particular, we review the potential contribution of maternal blood total cholesterol levels during pregnancy and the increased maternal transmission in newborns of mothers with diabetes. SUMMARY: In cord blood, cholesterol levels are lower than in adults and the relative proportion present in HDL as opposed to LDL is much higher. The currently available evidence suggests that several factors influence the composition of cord blood lipoproteins. Although inheritance of major monogenic disorders can affect cord lipids in general, the genetic contribution appears to be minimal, although effects of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexine type 9 gene (PCSK9) need fuller exploration in this regard in certain ethnic groups. Evidence is summarized that maternal lipoprotein levels, particularly those due to diet or induced by pregnancy, influence cord lipid levels. Placental insufficiency and other conditions affecting fetal growth and the mode of delivery may also influence cord lipoprotein concentrations. How maternal glucose tolerance during pregnancy affects cord blood lipoproteins remains unclear. In view of increasing evidence that cardiovascular risk may have prenatal antecedents, this would seem to be an important area for further investigation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher triglyceride levels among female newborns than among male newborns have been reported.
“Although higher triglyceride levels among female newborns than among male newborns have been reported”
From Triglycerides and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2011) · cites this paper as [305]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Triglycerides and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Miller, M., Stone, N. J., Ballantyne, C., Bittner, V., Criqui, M. H., Ginsberg, H. N., Goldberg, A. C., Howard, W. J., Jacobson, M. S., Kris-Etherton, P. M., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182160726 · Cited by 1,871 · see citing works
Lowering LDL—not only how low, but how long?
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1125884 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Sex differences in lipids: a life course approach
Holven, K. B., & Roeters van Lennep, J. (2023) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.117270 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bansal, N., Cruickshank, J. K., McElduff, P., & Durrington, P. N.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bansal, Narinder
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Lipidology
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 400-408
- ISSN
- 0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095379288
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Keywords
- prenatal influences, maternal cholesterol, maternal diabetes, maternal glucose tolerance, PCSK9, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, placental insufficiency, fetal growth, mode of delivery, cardiovascular risk
- MeSH terms
- Cholesterol, Diet, Female, Fetal Blood, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Lipoproteins, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Pregnancy, Triglycerides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review