The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in the Epidemiology of the First Attack of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review trends in the epidemiology of the first attack of acute pancreatitis (AP) based on reported population-based studies. METHODS: From Medline, we retrieved 18 full-length English language peer-reviewed original articles published from 1966 to June 2005 with population-based information on the epidemiology of first-attack AP. Trends over time were analyzed based on study- and country-specific data and the study site (UK vs non-UK). RESULTS: Eight studies were from the UK and 10 from other European centers. An increase in the annual incidence per 100,000 for first-attack AP was reported in 10 of 12 studies with longitudinal data from 4 countries (UK, Sweden, Denmark, and Netherlands). The overall AP incidence seems to be higher in non-UK studies compared with that of UK, partly explained by a higher incidence of alcoholic pancreatitis in non-UK studies. A linear trend for increase in gallstone pancreatitis incidence over time was observed irrespective of the study site (UK or non-UK). The AP incidence and mortality increased with age. Gallstone pancreatitis was more common in female subjects, and alcoholic pancreatitis was more common in middle-aged male subjects. The AP case fatality (%) has decreased over time, but the overall population mortality rate per 100,000 has remained unchanged. Recurrence after the first attack is milder with a substantially lower mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AP seems to be increasing. Differences in the incidence and etiology between and within countries reflect differences in the risk factor prevalence. Case-fatality rate, but not the population-based mortality rate, decreased over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Tenner, S., Baillie, J., DeWitt, J., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.218 · Cited by 2,327
The Epidemiology of Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer
Yadav, D., & Lowenfels, A. B. (2013) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068 · Cited by 1,974
Self-citationBesselink, M. G., van Santvoort, H. C., Buskens, E., Boermeester, M. A., van Goor, H., Timmerman, H. M., Nieuwenhuijs, V. B., Bollen, T. L., van Ramshorst, B., Witteman, B. J., et al. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60207-x · Cited by 1,367
Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis
Petrov, M. S., & Yadav, D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0087-5 · Cited by 915
Self-citationCurrent knowledge of hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis
Valdivielso, P., Ramírez-Bueno, A., & Ewald, N. (2014) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2014.08.008 · Cited by 439
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadav, D., & Lowenfels, A. B.
- Venue
- Pancreas
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 323-330
- ISSN
- 0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969153273
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in the Epidemiology of the First Attack of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.mpa.0000236733.31617.52
- The paper
- Yadav, D., & Lowenfels, A. B. (2006). Trends in the Epidemiology of the First Attack of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Pancreas. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mpa.0000236733.31617.52
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.