Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conjugated Equine Estrogens and Global Cognitive Function in Postmenopausal Women: Women???s Health Initiative Memory Study

Espeland, Mark A., Rapp, Stephen R., Shumaker, Sally A., Brunner, Robert, Manson, JoAnn E., Sherwin, Barbara B., Hsia, Judith, Margolis, Karen L., Hogan, Patricia E., Wallace, Robert, Dailey, Maggie, Freeman, Ruth, Hays, Jennifer·2004·Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey

Abstract

Data from the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS) were analyzed to determine whether conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) influences global cognitive function in women 65 to 79 years of age, and to compare its effects with those of CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, cognitive function was assessed in community-living women who had undergone hysterectomy. Baseline and follow-up information was available for 2808 women at 39 centers without probable dementia at the outset. They received either 1 daily tablet containing 0.625 mg of CEE or a matching placebo. Global cognitive function was estimated annually using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE). In both CEE and placebo recipients, 3SME scores tended to rise over time during the first 4 years. Placebo recipients had slightly higher mean scores. Subsequently, this increase became less evident. Test scores were lower in women assigned to receive CEE than in placebo patients during a mean follow up of 5.4 years. When the data were combined with those from the combined estrogen–progestin part of the WHIMS, women assigned to hormone therapy had lower mean 3MSE scores. Differences were less marked when women having dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or stroke were excluded from analysis. Adverse effects of hormone therapy were most evident in women having relatively less cognitive function at baseline. Serial 3MSE scores in women aged 65 and over in this trial indicated that those who received CEE had slightly but significantly lower average cognitive function than did placebo recipients. The effects of CEE alone were similar to those of CEE plus MPA in the combined treatment part of the study. The investigators conclude that neither CEE nor combined CEE-MPA should be given to older women with the object of preventing cognitive dysfunction. Women with relatively low cognitive function at baseline were especially vulnerable to the adverse effects of hormone therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ogx.0000140471.21348.f1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Espeland, M. A., Rapp, S. R., Shumaker, S. A., Brunner, R., Manson, J. E., Sherwin, B. B., Hsia, J., Margolis, K. L., Hogan, P. E., Wallace, R., Dailey, M., Freeman, R., & Hays, J.
Venue
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
Published
2004-10
Volume
59
Issue
10
Pages
712-714
ISSN
0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966493435
Cited by
222
References
1
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conjugated Equine Estrogens and Global Cognitive Function in Postmenopausal Women: Women???s Health Initiative Memory Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ogx.0000140471.21348.f1
The paper
Espeland, M. A., Rapp, S. R., Shumaker, S. A., Brunner, R., Manson, J. E., Sherwin, B. B., Hsia, J., Margolis, K. L., Hogan, P. E., Wallace, R., Dailey, M., Freeman, R., & Hays, J. (2004). Conjugated Equine Estrogens and Global Cognitive Function in Postmenopausal Women: Women???s Health Initiative Memory Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000140471.21348.f1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.