Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Endometrium

Altrabulsi, Basel, Malpica, Anais, Deavers, Michael T, Bodurka, Diane C, Broaddus, Russell, Silva, Elvio G·2005·American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Abstract

Undifferentiated carcinoma arising in the endometrium is considered a rare neoplasm with only a few studies published thus far. This limited number of studies is most likely a reflection of the underrecognition of this tumor because of a lack of diagnostic criteria to separate it from endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, FIGO grade 3. In this study, we present the clinicopathologic features of 16 cases of endometrial undifferentiated carcinoma. In addition, we review the clinicopathologic features of 33 cases of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, FIGO grade 3, and compare them with the undifferentiated cases. The age of the 16 patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium ranged from 40 and 69 years (mean, 59 years). Stage was known in 13 patients. Six (46%) patients presented with early stage disease (4 stage I and 2 stage II). Seven (54%) patients presented with advanced stage disease (2 stage III and 5 stage IV). Staging information was not available for 3 patients. Undifferentiated carcinoma was characterized by a proliferation of medium-sized, monotonous, epithelial cells growing in solid sheets with no specific pattern. Glands were not identified. Keratin immunostaining was focally positive in 11 of 12 cases, and EMA was focally positive in all 12 cases. The age of the 33 patients with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, FIGO grade 3, ranged from 40 to 90 years (mean, 68 years). Twenty-three (70%) patients presented with early stage disease (21 stage I and 2 stage II), and 10 (30%) patients presented with advanced stage disease (8 stage III and 2 stage IV). Focal glandular differentiation was seen in all cases. The solid component was different from the one seen in the undifferentiated carcinomas because well demarcated trabeculae, cords, or groups of cells were identified in all cases. The tumor cells in the solid areas resembled the cells in the glandular component of the tumor. Immunoperoxidase studies for keratin and EMA were positive in 23 of 23 cases. Twelve of the 16 (75%) patients with undifferentiated carcinoma died of disease; 10 (62.5%) of them within 5 years after diagnosis. In contrast, 13 of 33 (39.4%) patients with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, FIGO grade 3, died of disease. Twelve (36.4%) died within 5 years after diagnosis. In summary, undifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium appears to be more aggressive than endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, FIGO grade 3. Its proper recognition is important for prognosis and potentially for therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.pas.0000171003.72352.9a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Altrabulsi, B., Malpica, A., Deavers, M. T., Bodurka, D. C., Broaddus, R., & Silva, E. G.
Venue
American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
2005-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1316-1321
ISSN
0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094674030
Cited by
203
References
0
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Endometrium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.pas.0000171003.72352.9a
The paper
Altrabulsi, B., Malpica, A., Deavers, M. T., Bodurka, D. C., Broaddus, R., & Silva, E. G. (2005). Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Endometrium. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000171003.72352.9a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.