The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists
Open accessAbstract
In this review, we sought to address 2 important issues in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma: how to grade endometrial endometrioid carcinomas and how to incorporate the 4 genomic subcategories of endometrial carcinoma, as identified through The Cancer Genome Atlas, into clinical practice. The current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading scheme provides prognostic information that can be used to guide the extent of surgery and use of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. We recommend moving toward a binary scheme to grade endometrial endometrioid carcinomas by considering International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics defined grades 1 and 2 tumors as “low grade” and grade 3 tumors as “high grade.” The current evidence base does not support the use of a 3-tiered grading system, although this is considered standard by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the College of American Pathologists. As for the 4 genomic subtypes of endometrial carcinoma (copy number low/p53 wild-type, copy number high/p53 abnormal, polymerase E mutant, and mismatch repair deficient), which only recently have been identified, there is accumulating evidence showing these categories can be reproducibly diagnosed and accurately assessed based on biopsy/curettage specimens as well as hysterectomy specimens. Furthermore, this subclassification system can be adapted for current clinical practice and is of prognostic significance independent of conventional variables used for risk assessment in patients with endometrial carcinoma (eg, stage). It is too soon to recommend the routine use of genomic classification in this setting; however, with further evidence, this system may become the basis for the subclassification of all endometrial carcinomas, supplanting (partially or completely) histotype, and grade. These recommendations were developed from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists Endometrial Carcinoma project.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, & Levine, D. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12113 · Cited by 5,784
Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer
Talhouk, A., McConechy, M. K., Leung, S., Yang, W., Lum, A., Senz, J., Boyd, N., Pike, J., Anglesio, M., Kwon, J. S., et al. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30496 · Cited by 975
Self-citationA clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers
Talhouk, A., McConechy, M. K., Leung, S., Li-Chang, H. H., Kwon, J. S., Melnyk, N., Yang, W., Senz, J., Boyd, N., Karnezis, A. N., et al. (2015) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.190 · Cited by 971
Self-citationStelloo, E., Nout, R. A., Osse, E. M., Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I. J., Jobsen, J. J., Lutgens, L. C., van der Steen-Banasik, E. M., Nijman, H. W., Putter, H., Bosse, T., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2878 · Cited by 846
Kommoss, S., McConechy, M. K., Kommoss, F., Leung, S., Bunz, A., Magrill, J., Britton, H., Kommoss, F., Grevenkamp, F., Karnezis, A., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy058 · Cited by 776
Self-citationEndometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Colombo, N., Preti, E., Landoni, F., Carinelli, S., Colombo, A., Marini, C., & Sessa, C. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt353 · Cited by 600
Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Colombo, N., Preti, E., Landoni, F., Carinelli, S., Colombo, A., Marini, C., & Sessa, C. (2011) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr374 · Cited by 574
Poor Interobserver Reproducibility in the Diagnosis of High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma
Gilks, C. B., Oliva, E., & Soslow, R. A. (2013) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e31827f576a · Cited by 401
Self-citationBosse, T., Nout, R. A., McAlpine, J. N., McConechy, M. K., Britton, H., Hussein, Y. R., Gonzalez, C., Ganesan, R., Steele, J. C., Harrison, B. T., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001020 · Cited by 341
Self-citationSilva, E. G., Deavers, M. T., Bodurka, D. C., & Malpica, A. (2006) · International Journal of Gynecological Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.pgp.0000183048.22588.18 · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Cited by
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma
Concin, N., Matias-Guiu, X., Vergote, I., Cibula, D., Mirza, M. R., Marnitz, S., Ledermann, J., Bosse, T., Chargari, C., Fagotti, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230 · Cited by 1,989
Self-citationClinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer
Urick, M. E., & Bell, D. W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0177-x · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Soslow, R. A., Tornos, C., Park, K. J., Malpica, A., Matias-Guiu, X., Oliva, E., Parkash, V., Carlson, J., McCluggage, W. G., & Gilks, C. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- S64-S74
- ISSN
- 0277-1691 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2908657103
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 25.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/pgp.0000000000000518
- The paper
- Soslow, R. A., Tornos, C., Park, K. J., Malpica, A., Matias-Guiu, X., Oliva, E., Parkash, V., Carlson, J., McCluggage, W. G., & Gilks, C. B. (2019). Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/pgp.0000000000000518
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.