The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Microsatellite Instability, CpG Island Methylation Phenotype, BRAF and KRAS Status in Serrated Polyps and Traditional Adenomas Indicates Separate Pathways to Distinct Colorectal Carcinoma End Points
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare BRAF and KRAS, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in each of the histologic categories, including end-point carcinomas with residual adenoma, of the serrated polyp neoplasia pathway and the traditional (nonserrated) adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the selected samples and assayed for BRAF, KRAS2 codon12, 13, CIMP using markers hMLH1, MGMT, MINT1, MINT2, p16, and MSI using an assay for BAT25 and BAT26. A BRAF mutation was present in 82% of serrated carcinomas (SCas), 62% of serrated adenomas (SAs), 83% of serrated polyps with abnormal proliferation (SPAPs-syn. sessile serrated adenoma [SSA]), 76% of microvesicular serrated polyps (MVSPs), and was not found in any of the histologic categories of the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence. KRAS2 mutations were found in 43% of the goblet cell serrated polyp (GCSP) category, 13% of MVSPs, 7% of SPAPs, and 24% of SAs; in 26% of large traditional adenoma (lTAs) compared with small traditional adenomas (sTAs) (0/30; P<0.005) and in 37.3% of traditional carcinomas (TCa). CIMP-H (>1 marker positive) was significantly more frequent in SPAP, SA, and SCa compared with MVSP (P<0.05); CIMP-H was present in 10% of sTAs but was found more frequently in lTA (44.4%; OR 7.2; P=0.007) and TCa (38.9%; OR 5.8; P=0.007). Higher CIMP levels (4 or more markers positive) were significantly more frequent in advanced categories of the serrated pathway (SAs [31%] and SCas [30%]) compared with lTAs [0%] and TCAs [3.4%] (OR 12.2; P=0.02). MSI-H was identified only in the adenocarcinoma component of SCas (9/11) or in the contiguous SAs (3/7). The findings indicate that a BRAF mutation is a specific marker for a serrated polyp pathway that has its origin in a hyperplastic polyp (MVSP) and a potential end point as MSI carcinoma. CIMP-High (CIMP-H) develops early in this sequence and MSI-H develops late. The data provided a less complete picture of a second serrated pathway, identified by a KRAS2 mutation in SAs, but showed that the progressive stages of both iterations of the serrated neoplasia pathway are separate and distinct from those of the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi
Pollock, P. M., Harper, U. L., Hansen, K. S., Yudt, L. M., Stark, M., Robbins, C. M., Moses, T. Y., Hostetter, G., Wagner, U., Kakareka, J., et al. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1054 · Cited by 1,730
RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status
Rajagopalan, H., Bardelli, A., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Velculescu, V. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/418934a · Cited by 1,224 · cited 1×
“Methylation of CpG islands of the promoter regions of suppressor and mutator genes is thought to be the major mechanism of progression to malignancy in these sporadic MSI cancers;(12,20) other distinctive characteristics of this category of colon cancers are a strong association with activating mutations of BRAF and a…”
Background
Cited by
Pathways of Colorectal Carcinogenesis
Nguyen, L. H., Goel, A., & Chung, D. C. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.059 · Cited by 606
Molecular Pathways Involved in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Disease Behavior and Prevention
Colussi, D., Brandi, G., Bazzoli, F., & Ricciardiello, L. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140816365 · Cited by 429
Perrone, F., Lampis, A., Orsenigo, M., Di Bartolomeo, M., Gevorgyan, A., Losa, M., Frattini, M., Riva, C., Andreola, S., Bajetta, E., et al. (2009) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn541 · Cited by 410
Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Disease Mechanisms and Interventions to Reduce Onset and Mortality
Aran, V., Victorino, A. P., Thuler, L. C., & Ferreira, C. G. (2016) · Clinical Colorectal Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2016.02.008 · Cited by 365
Carragher, L. A. S., Snell, K. R., Giblett, S. M., Aldridge, V. S. S., Patel, B., Cook, S. J., Winton, D. J., Marais, R., & Pritchard, C. A. (2010) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201000099 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, M. J., Yang, S., Mack, C., Xu, H., Huang, C. S., Mulcahy, E., Amorosino, M., & Farraye, F. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Surgical Pathology
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1491-1501
- ISSN
- 0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071740158
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Microsatellite Instability, CpG Island Methylation Phenotype, BRAF and KRAS Status in Serrated Polyps and Traditional Adenomas Indicates Separate Pathways to Distinct Colorectal Carcinoma End Points. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.pas.0000213313.36306.85
- The paper
- O'Brien, M. J., Yang, S., Mack, C., Xu, H., Huang, C. S., Mulcahy, E., Amorosino, M., & Farraye, F. A. (2006). Comparison of Microsatellite Instability, CpG Island Methylation Phenotype, BRAF and KRAS Status in Serrated Polyps and Traditional Adenomas Indicates Separate Pathways to Distinct Colorectal Carcinoma End Points. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000213313.36306.85
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.