Cited by 50Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHead and Neck Cancer StudiesEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

Human Papillomavirus Type Distribution in Cervical Cancer in Delhi, India

Bhatla, Neerja, Dar, Lalit, Patro, A. Raj Kumar, Kriplani, Alka, Gulati, Arti, Verma, Kusum, Broor, Shobha, Shah, Keerti V. +1 more·2006·International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

Abstract

This hospital-based study in New Delhi, North India was performed to evaluate the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cases of invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC). A total of 10 cases presenting with an obvious cervical growth were included in this study. 108 cases that was shown to be ICC on histology (101 squamous cell carcinomas, 4 adenocarcinomas, and one neuroendocrine carcinoma) were included in the analysis. DNA was extracted from tumor tissue and HPV genotype was determined by a consensus PCR assay using a reverse line blot hybridization assay. Of 106 evaluable cases, 104 (98.1%) were positive for HPV infection. Twelve different high-risk HPV types were found. There were 125 infections, 119 of which were high risk. Six cases had associated low risk infections. HPV 16 was the commonest type, seen in 73.6% cases followed by HPV 18 (14.2%) and 45 (11.3%). A vaccine with 100% efficacy in prevention of HPV 16 and 18 infections would theoretically reduce the total cancer burden in New Delhi by more than 75% (assuming 100% coverage). Increasing the genotype spectrum (e.g. valency) if the existing vaccines would be expected to have only a modest impact on the potential for cervical protection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.pgp.0000209574.62081.e4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhatla, N., Dar, L., Patro, A. R. K., Kriplani, A., Gulati, A., Verma, K., Broor, S., Shah, K. V., & Gravitt, P. E.
Affiliations
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Bhatla, Neerja
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Published
2006-10
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
398-402
ISSN
0277-1691 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005494342
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
human papillomavirus, cervical cancer, HPV genotype distribution, HPV16, HPV 18, HPV45, high-risk HPV, HPV vaccine, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, New Delhi
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, DNA, Viral, Female, Genotype, Humans, India, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Risk Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review