Cited by 93Respiratory Support and MechanismsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchTracheal and airway disorders

Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation vs. Tracheal Suctioning via Tracheostomy Tubes for Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

Sancho, Jesús, Servera, Emilio, Vergara, Pedro, Marín, Julio·2003·American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation vs. suctioning via tracheostomy tubes on respiratory variables for six amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. DESIGN: In this prospective crossover study, six consecutive patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who required continuous mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy tubes and developed chest infections underwent measurement of pulse oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean airway pressure (Pawm), and work of breathing performed by the ventilator (WOBv) at baseline and 5 and 30 min after tracheal suctioning and 5 min after mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. RESULTS: The baseline values were 93.50 +/- 2.26% for SpO2 in ambient air, 18.50 +/- 4.23 cm H2O for PIP, 4.67 +/- 1.37 cm H2O for Pawm, and 1.03 +/- 0.25 J/liters for WOBv. Only WOBv changed significantly, decreasing after tracheal suctioning (P < 0.05), whereas all variables improved significantly after mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. CONCLUSION: For ventilator-dependent patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation via a tracheostomy tube with an inflated cuff may be more effective in eliminating airway secretions than conventional tracheal suctioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.phm.0000087456.28979.2e

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mechanical insufflation-exhalation applied to the tracheostomy cannula in ALS patients undergoing invasive home mechanical ventilation is an effective procedure for managing bronchial secretions.

    “Mechanical insufflation-exhalation (MI-E) applied to the tracheostomy cannula in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) undergoing invasive home mechanical ventilation is an effective procedure for managing bronchial secretions [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sancho, J., Servera, E., Vergara, P., & Marín, J.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Sancho, Jesús
Venue
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2003-10
Volume
82
Issue
10
Pages
750-753
ISSN
0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071794888
Cited by
93
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation, endotracheal suctioning, tracheostomy tube, ventilator-dependent patients, airway secretion clearance, work of breathing, peak inspiratory pressure, chest infection, continuous mechanical ventilation
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Female, Humans, Insufflation, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Middle Aged, Oximetry, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Insufficiency, Suction, Tracheostomy, Work of Breathing, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review