The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fat Grafting to the Breast Revisited: Safety and Efficacy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A 1987 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons position paper predicted that fat grafting would compromise breast cancer detection and should therefore be prohibited. However, there is no evidence that fat grafting to breasts is less safe than any other form of breast surgery. As discussions of fat grafting to the breast are surfacing all over the world, it is time to reexamine the opinions of the 1987 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons position paper. METHODS: This is a retrospective examination of 17 breast procedures performed using fat grafting from 1995 to 2000. Indications included micromastia, postaugmentation deformity, tuberous breast deformity, Poland's syndrome, and postmastectomy reconstruction deformities. The technique used was the Coleman method of fat grafting, which attempts to minimize trauma and place grafted fat in small aliquots at many levels. RESULTS: All women had a significant improvement in their breast size and/or shape postoperatively and all had breasts that were soft and natural in appearance and feel. Postoperative mammograms identified changes one would expect after any breast procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Given these results and reports of other plastic surgeons, free fat grafting should be considered as an alternative or adjunct to breast augmentation and reconstruction procedures. It is time to end the discrimination created by the 1987 position paper and judge fat grafting to the breast with the same caution and enthusiasm as any other useful breast procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R. G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E. R., Jeong, J.-H., & Wolmark, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022152 · Cited by 6,249
Cited by
Kølle, S.-F. T., Fischer-Nielsen, A., Mathiasen, A. B., Elberg, J. J., Oliveri, R. S., Glovinski, P. V., Kastrup, J., Kirchhoff, M., Rasmussen, B. S., Talman, M.-L. M., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61410-5 · Cited by 592
Delay, E., Garson, S., Tousson, G., & Sinna, R. (2009) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asj.2009.08.010 · Cited by 536
Current Applications and Safety of Autologous Fat Grafts: A Report of the ASPS Fat Graft Task Force
Gutowski, K. A. (2009) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181a09506 · Cited by 444
Gir, P., Brown, S. A., Oni, G., Kashefi, N., Mojallal, A., & Rohrich, R. J. (2012) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e318254b4d3 · Cited by 334
Yoshimura, K., Suga, H., & Eto, H. (2009) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/17460751.4.2.265 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, S. R., & Saboeiro, A. P.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 775-785
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037112812
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fat Grafting to the Breast Revisited: Safety and Efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9
- The paper
- Coleman, S. R., & Saboeiro, A. P. (2007). Fat Grafting to the Breast Revisited: Safety and Efficacy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000252001.59162.c9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.