The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To characterize and compare commercially available contrast media (CM) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of their relaxivity at magnetic field strengths ranging from 0.47 T to 4.7 T at physiological temperatures in water and in plasma. Relaxivities also were quantified in whole blood at 1.5 T. METHODS: Relaxivities of MRI-CM were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy at 0.47 T and MRI phantom measurements at 1.5 T, 3 T, and 4.7 T, respectively. Both longitudinal (T1) and transverse relaxation times (T2) were measured by appropriate spin-echo sequences. Nuclear magnetic resonance dispersion (NMRD) profiles were also determined for all agents in water and in plasma. RESULTS: Significant dependencies of relaxivities on the field strength and solvents were quantified. Protein binding leads to both increased field strength and solvent dependencies and hence to significantly altered T1 relaxivity values at higher magnetic field strengths. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the field strength and solvent associated with relaxivity data is crucial for the comparison and evaluation of relaxivity values. Data observed at 0.47 T can thus be misleading and should be replaced by relaxivities measured at 1.5 T and at 3 T in plasma at physiological temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Dots and Their Multimodal Applications: A Review
Bera, D., Qian, L., Tseng, T.-K., & Holloway, P. H. (2010) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma3042260 · Cited by 1,365
New Generation Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots for Biophotonics and Nanomedicine
Xu, G., Zeng, S., Zhang, B., Swihart, M. T., Yong, K.-T., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00290 · Cited by 587
Weinstein, J. S., Varallyay, C. G., Dosa, E., Gahramanov, S., Hamilton, B., Rooney, W. D., Muldoon, L. L., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.192 · Cited by 500
25 Years of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Developments, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives
Lohrke, J., Frenzel, T., Endrikat, J., Alves, F. C., Grist, T. M., Law, M., Lee, J. M., Leiner, T., Li, K.-C., Nikolaou, K., et al. (2016) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0275-4 · Cited by 420
A Manganese Alternative to Gadolinium for MRI Contrast
Gale, E. M., Atanasova, I. P., Blasi, F., Ay, I., & Caravan, P. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b10748 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohrer, M., Bauer, H., Mintorovitch, J., Requardt, M., & Weinmann, H.-J.
- Venue
- Investigative Radiology
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 715-724
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030003406
- Cited by
- 1,682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3
- The paper
- Rohrer, M., Bauer, H., Mintorovitch, J., Requardt, M., & Weinmann, H.-J. (2005). Comparison of Magnetic Properties of MRI Contrast Media Solutions at Different Magnetic Field Strengths. Investigative Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.