The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernias: Nine Years’ Experience With 850 Consecutive Hernias
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The recurrence rate after standard repair of ventral hernias may be as high as 12-52%, and the wide surgical dissection required often results in wound complications. Use of a laparoscopic approach may decrease rates of complications and recurrence after ventral hernia repair. METHODS: Data on all patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) performed by 4 surgeons using a standardized procedure between November 1993 and October 2002 were collected prospectively (85% of patients) or retrospectively. RESULTS: LVHR was completed in 819 of the 850 patients (422 men; 428 women) in whom it was attempted. Thirty-four percent of completed LVHRs were for recurrent hernias. The patient mean body mass index was 32; the mean defect size was 118 cm2. Mesh, averaging 344 cm2, was used in all cases. Mean operating time was 120 min, mean estimated blood loss was 49 mL, and hospital stay averaged 2.3 days. There were 128 complications in 112 patients (13.2%). One patient died of a myocardial infarction. The most common complications were ileus (3%) and prolonged seroma (2.6%). During a mean follow-up time of 20.2 months (range, 1-94 months), the hernia recurrence rate was 4.7%. Recurrence was associated with large defects, obesity, previous open repairs, and perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: In this large series, LVHR had a low rate of conversion to open surgery, a short hospital stay, a moderate complication rate, and a low risk of recurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Argument for Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh in Hernia Repair
Cobb, W. S., Kercher, K. W., & Heniford, B. T. (2005) · Surgical Innovation · doi:10.1177/155335060501200109 · Cited by 364
Self-citationConsequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions
Van Goor, H. (2007) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x · Cited by 320
Predictors of wound infection in ventral hernia repair
Finan, K. R., Vick, C. C., Kiefe, C. I., Neumayer, L., & Hawn, M. T. (2005) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.041 · Cited by 272
CT findings of complications after abdominal wall repair with prosthetic mesh
Lacour, M., Ridereau Zins, C., Casa, C., Venara, A., Cartier, V., Yahya, S., Barbieux, J., & Aubé, C. (2017) · Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.002 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Heniford, B. T., Park, A., Ramshaw, B. J., & Voeller, G.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 238
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-400
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314952833
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernias: Nine Years’ Experience With 850 Consecutive Hernias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000086662.49499.ab
- The paper
- Heniford, B. T., Park, A., Ramshaw, B. J., & Voeller, G. (2003). Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernias: Nine Years’ Experience With 850 Consecutive Hernias. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000086662.49499.ab
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.